Could Donovan McNabb Land With Ravens?

These are Ravens fans discussing how one fan’s opinion is wrong, how are we trolling our own blog?

As for Bulger, I am sure everyone here will agree that he definitely still has some serious talent left. It would be cool to see him make a huge come back with Arizona. Bulger is the fastest QB ever to 1000 completions. But there is no way he is better than Joe at this point and never showed one sign of that being the case, which is what Shadow argues.

He keeps talking about how we should have benched Joe for his week 2 performance against Cinci, but we keep telling him that Joe has the best QB rating in the league from that point on and Shadow doesn’t even respond to it because he knows how dumb his comment is to begin with.

I think he is a good guy and a class act. It isn’t that we dislike Bulger in any way, but to say that Bulger would have won us a SuperBowl when Joe couldn’t is pretty silly.

I have also heard that Arizona has soured on him and is looking at other people now.

Stats are only for accountants, and they don’t play football.

This is actually one of the only things I ever liked in any of your comments. Very nice.

Nobody here is using the Ravens offense lack of chemisry as a excuse for Joe Flacco. you said if tom brady was here we would had been in the super bowl, of course its freaking tom brady he could help just about any team get to the super bowl. Chemistry is important beleive that or not. When the patriots traded Randy Moss did they sign just some random free agent wideout? no. The Patriots traded their draft pick for seattle seahawks wideout Deion Branch.Branch was orginally a patrot before he got signed to the seahawks but once he came back to the patriots he immediately set it off with Tom Brady and had a good year unlike he was having in seattle for the past two years. When Peyton Manning lost Austin Colle, Dallas Clark,Anthony Gonzalez, and Tom Santi to injuries;Manning start sucking it up and not looking himself in the games and they start losing games that they should had won.

Show me where I said Bulger was a better quarterback than Flacco…..Tom Brady hasn’t won a playoff game in how many years, but you bring him here and I guarantee we will be in the supewr bowl the first year

You have said that Bulger would have gotten us to a SuperBowl by now. By your round about logic, you are comparing Bulger to Tom Brady now. Don’t you dare try and weasel out of what you have said multiple times. It seems that the more we bash your half baked opinion, the more covert it seems to get. Now you aren’t hating on Flacco directly, but the coaching to keep Flacco in the game…. which is bashing Flacco for playing poorly. Either stand up and be a man about your opinion and show factual information and not some silly analogy to curling or some other sport that has 0% to do with Football, or just leave the damn thing alone already.

The fact of the matter is that you can compare the Ravens and the Rams when Bulger first got the starting position. The rams had a better O-line and better offensive weapons and the Rams underperformed. When the O-line of the Rams got worse, Bulger got severely worse with it. Hell his old GM even said that Bulger is “gunshy” and “shell shocked” and has called him pretty much useless.

Your argument is that we will never know if Bulger is better because we won’t put him in. I don’t see Tom Brady’s or Peyton Manning’s backup going in the games when they do poorly. Who knows, the guy behind Brady might end up being the first QB to throw for 10,000 yards in a season.

By your weird ass logic, any 2nd stringer could possibly be the next Hall of Famer. While that is possibly true, I think I would trust the judgment of the Raven’s coaches and GMs to evaluate talent over someone that must have a Bulger rookie card that he needs to be worth something.

Your argument that

Stats are only for accountants, and they don’t play football./blockquote> No stats actually help us determine a pattern about a player or a team. In similar situations (Bulger playing behind the Ram’s Oline is similar to playing behind our line), you can clearly see that Bulger’s completion percentage is piss poor and that he completely breaks down as a player. Now stats can be manipulated to go one way or another, but I guarantee that you couldn’t find stats that are relevant, that would show Bulger is a better QB at this time in his career or even in the last 5 years.

You are simply trolling and its getting sad now. The only thing you ever seem to bring up is your dislike of Flacco

Its hard to be a better QB, when you can’t play an entire season. In Bulger’s 10 year career, he has only had 1 season in which he played all 16 games.

In that 1 season, he had stats that are eerily similar to all of Flacco’s 3 seasons (mid 60% completion percentage / 25TDs, 8 INTs / 7.3YD average).

So my point remains…. Bulger at his best can do as well as Flacco. At his worst, he plays 7 games in a season and spends the rest of the time on the bench. Those are the stats that prove a point. Those are stats that go along with the video of Bulger getting concussion after concussion because he moves like a bag of wet rocks in a pool of cement covered in maple syrup. Behind our line last year, he wouldnt have made it through 1 game and according to his entire career’s stats, he would have done just as well as Flacco.

My biggest stat that proves Bulger is mediocre, is his last season in STL, he bot benched in favor of Kyle Boller! I think we all agree that Boller is not great, and he got the start over Bulger.

Also using Plunkett as your excuse is really lame. For that 1 excuse of a QB that was piss poor his entire career (he only reached 60% completion percentage in 1 season, the rest were in the 40’s and 50’s, including that superbowl season) and won a superbowl, I can show you at least a hundred players with equal stats that couldn’t win a dozen games in their careers.

So yeah!