Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Six Ravens Make FoxSports.com's NFL's Top 100

FoxSports.com came up with a list of the NFL's Top 100 Players of 2010, and six players on the Baltimore Ravens made the list. In fact not only did the Ravens have six of the Top 100 players, they actually had six of the Top 74, and four of the Top 47. Any guesses before you read on who were those six Ravens? No peeking!

The top five players unfortunately did not include any Ravens. Counting down from #5 through #1, the list goes: Tennessee Titans RB Chris Johnson, Pittsburgh Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger (what!?), New England Patriot QB Tom Brady, New Orleans Saints QB Drew Brees and Indianapolis COlts QB Peyton Manning.

Click on the 'Jump' to see which Ravens made the list.

Star-divide

74. WR Anquan Boldin - Boldin was rated higher in 2009 (I can't seem to find the list of #'s 61-80 to get the exact number of what Boldin was ranked last season), when he was catching passes from future Hall of Famer Kurt Warner.

64. DT Haloti Ngata - I thought he might be rated a bit higher, but then again, not so bad for an interior lineman.

47. QB Joe Flacco - Interesting that Joe was rated higher than Carson Palmer, Donovan McNabb and Matt Schaub. Guess three playoff wins on the road in your first two years sort of helps, huh? Also interesting is that #46 is Brett Favre, but then again Matt Ryan is #36, so go figure?

32. RB Ray Rice - Out of nowhere from a year ago, Rice rockets up to near the head of the class and most Ravens' fans believe he will be a lot higher ranked after 2010.

30. S Ed Reed - While Reed is highly rated, the bubble bursts when you see that the Steelers' Troy Polamalu is ranked at #14.

20. ILB Ray Lewis - Ray is the highest rated Raven on the list and while it is still a huge honor for a 14 year veteran who will be 35 years old when the 2010 season begins, he is behind the San Francisco 49ers' Patrick Willis, who is known around the league as the "next Ray Lewis."

See the entire story and listing by clicking here.

Comment 58 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Putting Matt Ryan ahead of Brett Favre officially makes this a terrible list.

"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco

"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden

by jackmca on Jun 26, 2010 11:56 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Jay Ratfliff is not better than Ngata. Suggs should be on the list.

by Raven_all_day on Jun 26, 2010 12:14 PM EDT reply actions  

thought he had a subpar year, attempting to come back after his injury

by Raven_all_day on Jun 27, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

ratliff is arguable better than Ngata, according to the d-line rankings, he is the best NT in the game

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=jc-dlinerankings062810

by Rayisyourdaddy on Jun 28, 2010 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

IDK the way they described Ratliff compared to how Ngata was described I like NGATA.

by Raven_all_day on Jun 28, 2010 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ratliff is very very good, no question. I don’t think he’s as versatile as Ngata, but Ratliff is almost like a Kelly Gregg-type who can get sacks. He’s stout and a bit undersized, but he uses his center of gravity masterfully and is very disruptive in that 34 scheme. I definitely like Ratliff.

I don’t think he’s better than Ngata but you’re not getting laughed out of the room if you think he is.

It’s the rest of this list that I have a problem with. Matt Ryan is better than Brett Favre? No, not exactly.

Randy Moss in number 28 while Brandon Marshall is number 85? I’m pretty sure Marshall just caught 100 balls, AGAIN, this time with Kyle Orton throwing at him. Ergo, Marshall > Moss.

Haynesworth is 56 while Ngata is 64. Starting to think this guy hasn’t seen Haloti play.

Obviously Ben Roethlisberger is not one of the 5 best players in the league. The list has him (correctly) behind Brees, Manning, and Brady, but I don’t even think he’s as good as Rivers, Favre or Rodgers, and that’s just QBs. (Of course this guy thinks Matt Ryan is better than Brett Favre so I shouldn’t be that surprised.)

Eli Manning is number 24? You’ve got to be kidding me. This guy must have not watched football for about 5 straight weeks after the G-Men took their 5-0 start and flushed it down the toilet, all with some highly questionable Quarterbacking from the younger Manning.

I could go on and on.

"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco

"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden

by jackmca on Jun 29, 2010 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

would u put Ngata above Haynesworth?

by Raven_all_day on Jun 30, 2010 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

As of right now, yes. The way Haynesworth is acting towards a defensive switch from 4-3 to 3-4 shows that he is not versatile at all. If we ever switched to a 4-3 (we definitely already have 4-3 schemes) there is no doubt that Ngata would be just as dominant. Ngata is up there with Pat Williams of the Vikings and Ratliff of the Cowboys.

"However, the true greatness of the Ravens’ line lies in their malevolence, led by right end Haloti Ngata. Simply put, Ngata can’t be blocked by mere mortals. He is not a product of the human species. He is really a creation of a building contractor, made of cinderblocks and some type of flesh-like covering. Throw in Kelly Gregg at nose tackle and behemoth rookie Terrence Cody and you have something truly frightening."

by Mr MaLoR on Jun 30, 2010 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

he is the best NT in the game

Well Ngata does not play NT. So Ngata is just the best BEAST in the game.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jun 29, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ngata is the best baby eater in the game. Even Man vs. Food had to have a special episode, Man vs. Baby, and when Man and Ngata had a baby-eating race, Man lost to Ngata and was kicked in the face by multiple babies. Ngata can’t be touched.

"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco

"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden

by jackmca on Jun 29, 2010 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Amen brotha.

"However, the true greatness of the Ravens’ line lies in their malevolence, led by right end Haloti Ngata. Simply put, Ngata can’t be blocked by mere mortals. He is not a product of the human species. He is really a creation of a building contractor, made of cinderblocks and some type of flesh-like covering. Throw in Kelly Gregg at nose tackle and behemoth rookie Terrence Cody and you have something truly frightening."

by Mr MaLoR on Jun 29, 2010 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ryan should not be ahead of Flacco, i guess if you have commercials thats better than winning games ad stats.

by Raven_all_day on Jun 26, 2010 12:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Guess Joe gets negative points

for having a better team around him?

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jun 26, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Roethlisberger over Rodgers?

Lol, foxsports is retarded.

I think Rodgers may even be better than Manning and Brady this year.

by mlb32001 on Jun 27, 2010 12:02 AM EDT reply actions  

could be

He’s like the Dwayne Wade of the NFL. For all we know, he’s the best player in the league right now.

"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco

"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden

by jackmca on Jun 28, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

So few ravens?

How is Chris Johnson top 5 and Ray Rice is 32? They should be ranked around t he same. Both 2nd year players who exploded. So what that CJ had a couple more yards; he was also less consistent.

And Ngata at 60-something? that are not 40 players better than him in the league, let alone 60!

by Rayisyourdaddy on Jun 27, 2010 9:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Ngata is ranked way too low.

by BmoreBlitz on Jun 28, 2010 7:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

CJ had “a couple more yards”, you mean 667 yards is just a couple? He joined a list that is very short and Rice was no where near that. Not too add that CJ had 16 TDs to Rice’s 8. Yeah..I’d say that ranking is fair.

Also, how is CJ not consistent? He finished the season with 11 straight games with over 100 rushing yards. That’s pretty damn consistent.

But anyway, this list is crap.

"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"

by John Stephens on Jun 28, 2010 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

CJ a couple more yards...

I was including receiving yards, and didnt realize that CJ had 500 rec yards to Rice’s 700. So the total gap ends up being 2500 to 2000. I apologize. And you are right about CJ having more TD’s, although Rice obviously had many chances poached by McGahee.

I called him inconsistent because of his first half of the season, but looking at Rice’s game log, he had similar problems. However, I still do not think that they should be separated by that much in their rankings, because Rice will get more opportunities this year, and I doubt CJ tops his TD total or his yard total from last year. The drop off historically for every player who ever had 350+ carries in a season is gigantic.

Check out these articles:
http://www.footballdocs.com/running_back_carries.html
http://www.fantasydc.com/?p=867

by Rayisyourdaddy on Jun 28, 2010 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

CJ wont do anything anyway because the titans not going to pay him so he’s not playing.

by Raven_all_day on Jun 28, 2010 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

The drop off historically for every player who ever had 350+ carries in a season is gigantic.

No matter how good they are, they’re still human beings, and no body can take that kind of beating without consequences. That’s why Ravens’ fans need to be grateful for McGahee and McClain. Those guys are really extending the career of Rice, who already has a ton of mileage from his days at Rutgers.

by BAL_Hawk on Jun 29, 2010 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

That’s true. In college, the hits are a lot less severe though.

by BmoreBlitz on Jun 29, 2010 9:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

"Gigantic"

Like when the Edge went from ’99 369 carries 1553 yards to ’00 387 carries 1709 yards? OR LT ’02 372 carries 1683 yards to ’03 313 carries 1645 yards? Or Rudi Johnson ’04 went 361 and 1452 to ’05 337 1458? Or Tiki Barber ’05 went 357 for 1860 to ’06 327 1662?

Clearly its not “every time”. Also, notice that a good portion of these players are in the middle or near the end of their career. CJ is only going into his 3rd year. Do I think he will have another 2,000 year? No, but I do believe he will still have around 1,500 yards and a lot of big runs.

"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"

by John Stephens on Jun 29, 2010 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree.

Johnson is a freak of nature and should still be a stud this season. There are parts of Rice’s game that are better than Johnson’s, but not many people, even Ravens fans, would argue that Rice is on the same level as Johnson. However, considering that Johnson was a first-rounder and Rice was a second-rounder, I’m happier with Rice since we also have Flacco.

You can’t tell me that the Steelers wouldn’t draft Rice over Mendenhall and/or Sweed if they could do it again. They must really be kicking themselves for passing on Chris Johnson, who was taken right after Mendenhall. That draft was a bust for you guys.

by BAL_Hawk on Jun 29, 2010 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sure hindsight is 20/20. I wouldn’t say the draft is a bust for us considering Mendenhall had quite a nice season last year, even though he didn’t start all 16 games. I expect this to be a big year for him too.

Also, we got Dennis Dixon and Ryan Mundy from that draft, two players in back up roles right now. Not bad. Jury is still out on Tony Hills.

"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"

by John Stephens on Jun 29, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

It wasn’t a total bust for an average team, but it was a bust by Steeler’s standards.

Good teams can’t consistently have drafts like that or they won’t be good teams much longer.

by BAL_Hawk on Jun 29, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah

its OK if you get serviceable backups and one starter out of a draft. But if you make a habit of drafting one starter and a crowd of backups, pretty soon you’ll have a team of backups.

"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco

"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden

by jackmca on Jun 29, 2010 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

How many Steelers draft picks have started their fist year? Second year? Not a lot. Also, when you are sitting behind two great players…you are not going to get much PT. Tony Hills could very well end up being a starter down the line…same with Mundy. And possibly even Dixon if Ben screws up again.

You can’t effectively grade a draft until 5 or more years afterward.

"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"

by John Stephens on Jun 29, 2010 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can’t effectively grade a draft until 5 or more years afterward.

I understand your logic and agree to an extent. However, rookies that are immediately productive are a huge help to a team and should add value to a team’s draft grade. Obviously, the final grade can’t be decided until several years later, but a rookie’s early production has to add to the draft grade. In fact, I would say that drafting players that perform well within the first five seasons is a measure of success and having a draft that takes five years to develop isn’t necessarily a good thing.

by BAL_Hawk on Jun 29, 2010 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then the Steelers have not had a good draft in my entire life, by your argument.

"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"

by John Stephens on Jun 29, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not saying that immediate production is the definition of a good draft.

I’m just saying that immediate production adds value to a team’s draft class. If a player takes five years to be productive, he needs to be very good in order to be as valuable to his team as another player who has been producing from day one.

by BAL_Hawk on Jun 29, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ike Taylor, Troy, Woodley, Hampton, Timmons, Ben, Wallace were all pretty damn good in their first 1-2 years if I recall, so not sure what you are getting at…

"However, the true greatness of the Ravens’ line lies in their malevolence, led by right end Haloti Ngata. Simply put, Ngata can’t be blocked by mere mortals. He is not a product of the human species. He is really a creation of a building contractor, made of cinderblocks and some type of flesh-like covering. Throw in Kelly Gregg at nose tackle and behemoth rookie Terrence Cody and you have something truly frightening."

by Mr MaLoR on Jun 29, 2010 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly

and that’s pretty much the Steelers’ core group right now. Great teams are built from great drafts, and a great draft has to have at least one impact rookie and one more player who is an impact player within his first 3 seasons. Obviously that’s not a hard and fast rule but if you look at draft histories, I think you’ll find that good teams generally have a pattern of drafts like that. One impact rookie and another player who makes an impact in the next couple of years.

"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco

"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden

by jackmca on Jun 29, 2010 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

and

and the steelers’ draft history seems to follow that pattern, more or less. Obviously you’ll have on-years and off-years, with some incredible drafts and some bust-heavy drafts, but by and large I think that pattern holds.

"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco

"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden

by jackmca on Jun 29, 2010 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

If a guy hasn’t shown flashes in his first 2 years, in all likelihood he will not amount to anything. If a player hasn’t become a starter by is 3rd year, then he will not be a very good starter EVER. You don’t need 5 years to judge a draft; you need 3

by Rayisyourdaddy on Jun 29, 2010 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

No. Ike Taylor started 2 games his first two years and did not have the playbook down so he was lost at times when he did get in.

Troy started 0 games and definitely overplayed a lot of plays when he did get in.

Woodley started 0 games his first year and was not great in pass coverage when he got in.

Casey Hampton has always been a beast that one is right. It took him 6 weeks to start though.

Ben was very good, but did get to join a team with the best running offense and a great D. He was not as good then as he is now.

Wallace definitely has speed and good hands, but his route running was not great last year. Also, he wasn’t very good at reading blitzes and changing his routes with Ben. He only started 4 games too.

I could name a lot more players that ended up siting for 2 or 3 years and then became good players. Players that developed and then became great.

"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"

by John Stephens on Jun 29, 2010 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

but even you said it

2 or 3 years. Not 5. By year three, the player you will be is within sight. At year 4, most players are who they are.

Even if a guy doesn’t make a lot of starts or even any starts by the end of his second year, he has to show you some promise in some way or something is wrong.

"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco

"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden

by jackmca on Jun 29, 2010 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I see what you’re saying and agree that developing players works. The Ravens do the same thing, but I don’t think that logic applies to what you’re arguing. Sure, the Steelers have developed great players in the past, but those players at least showed flashes before they started.

Polamalu, Woodley… those guys became great players, but it was pretty obvious from day one that the were going to be good and had tons of talent. They weren’t like Sweed, Hills, Davis, Lewis, Burnett… those guys haven’t flashed much of anything.

In the last three drafts, the Steelers don’t appear to have many good players to develop. Mendenhall, Dixon, Wallace, and Pouncey look good. However, I think the Steelers are in trouble if those guys are their best players in the last three draft classes. Sure, any player can have a break-out season, but there’s usually a reason that they break-out. You can’t teach talent, and most of the Steelers’ recent draft selections haven’t been flashing talent in my opinion.

by BAL_Hawk on Jun 29, 2010 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Woodley and Polamalu both showed flashes in year 1, and had great seasons in year 2. Trpy had 5 int in year 2, Woodley had 11.5 sacks in year 2. I remember both their rookie years, and you could tell they were going to be something special already in year 1. Big Ben was solid in his first year, and started breaking out in year 2. Santonio Holmes had solid yardage in year 1, then topped that yardage and upped his td’s from 2 to 8 in year 2. Ryan Clark started slow and didn’t do much for his first 2 years, but by year 3 he had 81 tackles. Hampton has been solid his whole career. Heath Miller was good from his rookie year. Ziggy Hood showed flashes of being special last year, we will see how he can build on that this year. Mendenhall took the leap in year 2, despite splitting carries and missing half of his rookie year with an injury. Timmons started contributing to the team in year 2, and upped his production in year 3. And Hines Ward showed plent of flashes in years 2 and 3, and finally came into his own in year 4 with an 1000 yd season.

So I just went through 11 of your teams best players from last year, and all of them were producing at a high level, or at least showing flashes no later than year 2. There are exceptions, like Harrison, who took 4 years to come into his own, or Farrior, who took 5 years to come into their own. But notice that their original teams did not reap the benefits. With Harrison, he was cut 4 times by the time he started really producing. And Farrior was in his 5th year with the Jets, and then walked in free agency.

So bottom line is, there is probably about a 1% chance a player who hasn’t shown anything by year 2 will be a pro-bowler, and a 5% chance he will be an above average starter in this league. (pulled the numbers out my ass, but you get the point)

by Rayisyourdaddy on Jun 30, 2010 7:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Please read the argument
I understand your logic and agree to an extent. However, rookies that are immediately productive are a huge help to a team and should add value to a team’s draft grade. Obviously, the final grade can’t be decided until several years later, but a rookie’s early production has to add to the draft grade. In fact, I would say that drafting players that perform well within the first five seasons is a measure of success and having a draft that takes five years to develop isn’t necessarily a good thing.

A 2nd and 3rd year player are not rookies.

"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"

by John Stephens on Jun 30, 2010 8:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

yes but

most of those players CONTRIBUTED in their rookie years. Woodley, Polamalu, Hood, Big Ben, Holmes, Hampton, Miller all contributed in year one. That doesn’t mean there weren’t holes in their games, cuz there always are when it comes to rookies, but they helped their team be successful.

the rest of my argument was against your argument that it takes 5 years to develop. I was just saying that most players show stuff by season 3 latest.

by Rayisyourdaddy on Jun 30, 2010 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

That wasn’t my argument, but I can’t teach you to read and comprehend unfortunately.

"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"

by John Stephens on Jun 30, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

i dunno buddy that sounded a lot like your argument to me. But I can’t teach you to communicate effectively unfortunately.

"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco

"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden

by jackmca on Jul 1, 2010 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Actually, Keenan Lewis and Joe Burnett have had flashes. But I suppose since you all know the Steelers better than I do, you are right.

You can name pretty much any position and the Steelers have a guy ready to step up or a very promising talent at that position. The only exceptions I could see are SS, but Troy still has many good years in him. WR, maybe a big #1, but the Steelers won a SB without one before. G when Pouncey goes to center we will need a guard.

You can see how bemusing I find it when you all mention age and the Steelers being screwed this year and the near future.

Also, how in the heck can you judge what the Steelers have from this years draft? Cuts have not even been made yet. Are you a fortune teller? Also, Ziggy doesn’t look good? Come on, if you watch as many Steelers games as you suggest you should know he is going to be very good. Look back at 2009 if you think it was a bad draft, we got Wallace and Ziggy who are both good. Then we have Keenan Lewis competing for #2 CB and Joe Burnett who is definitely going to be on the roster. And Frank Summers might be our 3rd or 4th RB. So 5 out of 9 make the roster, and it’s a bad draft? What?

"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"

by John Stephens on Jun 30, 2010 8:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Calm down buddy, we are just stating our opinion, no need to take it the
wrong way and be sarcastic here. If we were wrong, let the Steeler homerness tell us why.

"However, the true greatness of the Ravens’ line lies in their malevolence, led by right end Haloti Ngata. Simply put, Ngata can’t be blocked by mere mortals. He is not a product of the human species. He is really a creation of a building contractor, made of cinderblocks and some type of flesh-like covering. Throw in Kelly Gregg at nose tackle and behemoth rookie Terrence Cody and you have something truly frightening."

by Mr MaLoR on Jun 30, 2010 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

I never said that I “know the Steelers” better than you. In fact, I’m pretty sure I said the opposite at the beginning of this conversation.

As far as the personnel are concerned, I like Hood. I just forgot to mention him. All I was really saying is that the Steelers’ recent draft classes seemed weak to me, and the 2008 draft with Mendenhall and Sweed seems particularly weak. I didn’t bring up any players from the 2010 draft. I realize that it would be stupid to judge those players.

I’m just throwing my opinion out there and trying to have a thoughtful conversation with a knowledgeable Steelers fan. I realize that my opinions aren’t fact and like to increase my understanding by talking to people who are informed.

by BAL_Hawk on Jun 30, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

You said the last 3 years were bad drafts, which is not true. 2008 is the down year, which still yielded a starter and 3 more roster spots. That will most likely be 2 starters if Mundy takes over for Clark down the line.

2009 has as of now 1 starter and 5-6 more roster spots. Ultimately, I think maybe 4 or 5 could be starters. Hood, Wallace, Lewis, Harris, and maybe Burnett.

2010…who knows.

"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"

by John Stephens on Jun 30, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whatever, man. I thought we were having a conversation.

I was just trying to talk. Go back and read my comments. You won’t find a single hostile sentence. I think you want to win even if we aren’t arguing or disagreeing. It’s a shame because I think we could have some good conversations, but I don’t really enjoy talking with someone who is rude, insulting and sarcastic if you happen to disagree with their opinions.

by BAL_Hawk on Jun 30, 2010 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry, sarcasm is my nature. Its not really meant to be rude.

"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"

by John Stephens on Jul 1, 2010 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

not mention Pouncey who is going to start but get dominated by our D-line.

by Raven_all_day on Jun 30, 2010 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

you must be interning on cap hill

"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco

"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden

by jackmca on Jun 29, 2010 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

naw man he is high off of roster spots

by Raven_all_day on Jun 30, 2010 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fox Sports has an NFC bias. CBS where’s your rebuttle?

by BmoreBlitz on Jun 28, 2010 7:49 AM EDT reply actions  

This ranking of players doesn't hold water or urine.

This is the type of crap that can kill the integrity of a writer or even a network.
Definitely “Jumping the Shark”.

Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to prosper. -Benjamin Franklin
Hang on, I gotta pinch me off a Cleveland Steamer -Tenacious D

by shockeRKhan on Jun 28, 2010 7:36 PM EDT reply actions  

This kind of crap can diminish the integrity of a writer or even a network.
Definitely “Jumping the Shark”.

Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to prosper. -Benjamin Franklin
Hang on, I gotta pinch me off a Cleveland Steamer -Tenacious D

by shockeRKhan on Jun 28, 2010 7:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Baltimore Ravens.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Unitas_-_brooks_final_game_memorial_stadium_small
A Look at the Ravens 2012 Salary Cap

Recent FanPosts

Small
STEFON DIGGS!!!
Small
Ricky Williams Retiring
Small
A Pats Fan With a Humble Request
Small
Ravens' Offseason Predictions
Baltimore_ravens_alt_small
Super Bowl...
Unitas_-_brooks_final_game_memorial_stadium_small
Dear Ursula
Small
Offseason Predictions..
Small
Sexy Super Bowl
739c5943_small
Coaches That Should Be On The Ravens Radar

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Br-ravens2_small Bruce Raffel

Editor

Edreed4_small Zachary Beard

Author

Joestache_small Mr MaLoR

30_frankensuggs_news_small lastcallbmore

Reed_small WestminsterRaven