Cincy Jungle Grades the AFC North

by Bruce Raffel on Mar 22, 2010 6:00 AM EDT

Over at the Cincinnati Bengals blog, Cincy Jungle, Kirkendall does an interesting analysis of what the off season moves have done to the balance of the AFC North. He rates the moves of, for instance, the Baltimore Ravens trade for Anquan Boldin and compares it to the free agent signing of Antonio Bryant by the Bengals, saying they believe the Bryant signing is better for the Bengals than the Ravens acquisition of Boldin.

That might sit fine with Cincinnati fans, butsomething tells me most Ravens fans will feel otherwise and therefore I urge you to calmly visit our AFC North brethren at Cincy Jungle to post your dissenting thoughts, but please do so in appropriate terms.

For more on their analysis of the entire division, including their thoughts on our mutual enemies, the Pittsburgh Steelers, along with the cellar-dwelling, yet improving Cleveland Browns, click here.

Tweet Comment 5 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

They can have my click.

But somehow going over there to argue whether a WR who defines inconsistency is better than a multiple pro bowl WR is not going to go calmly. Both sides are hyper-defensive so just going to be bad news if we debate this over the internet.

So in your interests Bruce I will stay out, but thanks for the link.

by ATXRaven on Mar 22, 2010 7:53 AM EDT reply actions

Fail.

Sorry Bruce, I couldn’t help myself… but I kept it at least clean and not so insulting for a change.

by ATXRaven on Mar 22, 2010 8:15 AM EDT up reply actions

HAHA! You made it only 20 minutes before you cracked.

by BmoreBlitz on Mar 22, 2010 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions

Where is the grade?

Only thing I saw was them calling their off-season “boring.” Did not even grade ours, although I feel they would have given the Bengals a A- and Ravens a B+ because Bryant is obviously worth the same 4 year $28 million contract that Boldin got.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Mar 22, 2010 8:38 AM EDT reply actions