Boldin, Mason Will Spread Defenses
As good as the Baltimore Ravens receiving game is shaping up to be in 2010, the running game is sure to benefit from the recent acquisitions. With both Anquan Boldin and Derrick Mason on the edges, not to mention Donte Stallworth or probably Mark Clayton in the slot, the running backs are likely to see a lot more empty space in front of them when they line up in the backfield. Hopefully, that will translate into a lot more empty space after they burst through the defensive fronts that they have ever seen here in Baltimore.
Let's not get out of control just yet, as we must remember that the Ravens are still a run-first offense and somehow I doubt Head Coach John Harbaugh will allow Offensive Coordinator Cam Cameron to try to turn us into the Arizona Cardinals or the "Greatest Show on Turf" just yet.
Over the years since the Ravens have been one of the more competitive teams in the NFL (since the 2000 season), defenses have been able to crowd the line of scrimmage with eight or even nine guys and then just dare our QB's to find the open receivers, which rarely happened. Luckily, our running game was so good that we were still able to move the ball, passing only when we really had to, and then rely on the defense to either win the game or at least get the turnover to shorten the field and leading to "cheap" points for our challenged offense.
Early last season, we saw glimpses of what could have been, as the team turned to the passing game the first three games of the season before finding out that wouldn't work against the better teams in the league as we lost our next three. The Ravens returned to their older ways of running the ball and playing improved defense to make the post season, but our offensive flaws were once again exposed against the better teams in the playoffs.
Now it appears that for the first time in team history, we have an All-Pro wide receiver to go along with an All-Pro running back. This year there will be no excuse why our offense cannot up its passing attack while at the same time keeping that run-first mentality. Opponents that choose to stack the box will see Ray Rice, Willis McGahee and LeRon McClain burst through into daylight and instead of seeing the safeties right in their face they will see the open field ahead of them. If opponents choose to dare Joe Flacco to beat them now, he will assuredly burn them if they decide to cover both Boldin and Mason one-on-one. Those two guys alone will improve this offense even if the play is not even designed for them. They will forever change the way opponents game plan to defense this offense and therefore, the possibilities are endless. Harbaugh was saying at the press conference introducing Boldin to the media that Cameron was already drawing up plays in his head as soon as the trade was announced.
Defenses will definitely spread out now for these guys. What QB Joe Flacco does with the ball when they don't is what will determine how much things change, or stay the same.
48 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The only weakness I see is that neither Mason or Boldin are real deep threats. Out of two WR sets I don’t think the safeties will be too far back. Rushing production will go up, but I imagine it will be more the effect of more first downs and more time with the lead.
Two WR sets may be a thing of the past.
3 Wr, 1 TE, 1 RB or 3 WR, 2 RB will be our base offense I’m guessing. We don’t have two good TE’s to put on the field at the same time (even if we draft one, Heap is often injured). With our improved tackle situation, TE blocking is less of a necessity(Sp?).
Purple Power Sets
Cam Cameron is a good OC (imo) and will be under pressure to win while incorporating his new weapons (Boldin, Stallworth and any skill player taken in the draft) into the offense.I beileve that this team will reamain a run base offense first. It has to be this way given the division and weather factors that can dictate these circumstances. I think coach Harbaugh understands this and will not allow this team to deviate too much from it’s identity moving forward.
That said, the good coaches adapt from week to week according to opponents strength and weakness and put personnel on the field to attack said opponnent appropriately. So I’m saying there will be times when Boldin and the boys will be in spread sets. Boldin, Mason and Stallworth along with Clayton pose a ton of problems for oppossing DC’s in the 11 (3 WR) or 10 (4 WR) personnel groupings. Look for some of this to be a huge part of the offense moving forward with the route combinations a nightmare matchup for the opponents.
Stallworth has much to prove and will be motivated. People forget that he is……. at his best an explosive vertical WR, Mason is sneaky fast although not a burner, and Boldin can get deep depending on the route combinations.
Wasn't done yet (sorry)
The 3 by 1 sets in stack or bunch formations, rub routes with pick elements are ways to get WR’s open and vertical streching the field and attacking it. Heap or a young TE will be a key cog in the base offense. If Heap has some juice left and is healthy his ability to get down the seam is huge. The fact that all these guy’s are veterans will aid Flacco and the no huddle offense can be more effective than last season with the new talent.
Lastly, Rice is a terrific player in these spread sets and his dynamic explosiveness will be on greater display and his running lanes could be huge.
Great commentary and breakdown, R-1
I can see both Stallworth and Clayton going deep but also plays designed to get Boldin the ball in open space, so he can get his YAC. Mason always seems to get the ball with his back upfield, so his YAC is usually minimal.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Mar 12, 2010 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
If I had my way in the draft...
I would like to trade back if we can not get a team to bite on Gaither, but aside from that, corner or DE (not outside LB), then a TE who can stretch the middle.
With a younger, and more atheletic TE to compliment our new WR corps, the need for a true deep threat is diminished (somewhat).
That said, I think (hope) Stallworth can be the WR that will keep defenses honest.
Last thing, how many times in Boldin or Mason’s career have they gotten to work one on one? Now maybe not both at the same time, but even at 36, I still can’t see a second or third corner covering Mason one on one consistently.
by 60minuteassassin on Mar 12, 2010 11:27 AM EST reply actions
I was thinking last night
that we have a QB that wants to be traded, and an OLT that we would trade for the right offer. I was trying to think of teams that need that particular combination, and I realized St. Louis does. I highly doubt it would ever happen, but how cool would it be to give Gaither and Smith to them for the right to draft McCoy? I think he fits better in a 3-4 than Suh does. Not going to happen, but it’s a nice thought.
"I wouldn't mind seeing someone erase my record of hitting into four triple plays" - Brooks
I don't think either one fits what we need
and would prefer a rush end or LB, as well as a top flight corner. If we could trade up and get Joe Haden r Earl Thomas, then I say go for it. But remember, any corner we get might take a back seat to Webb once he’s healthy. That said, we absolutely need a top pass rusher more than anything else in the draft.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Mar 12, 2010 3:45 PM EST up reply actions
Who doesn't need a McCoy or Suh?
Can you imagine Ngata next to one of them for the next five years?
Won’t happen but I ’m pretty sure the Ravens would very strongly consider this the numbers worked and the deal was on the table.
Well dreams like that usually do not come true. And if we did bring Suh or McCoy in (preferably Suh) than wouldn’t we have to switch to a 4-3? I think it is wrong to have Ngata at DE and need him at DT. Same with Suh. But hey, would not mind either of those guys on our team. Or Eric Berry.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
Ozzie has zero desire
to pick in the top five. He’d trade down to garner more picks in a second. Never happen. Nev er.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Mar 12, 2010 7:50 PM EST up reply actions
i may be biased
I still feel that Eron could be amazing in the slot. Even if they use him just to run the safeties off. That will give mason and boldin time to work underneath and give our backs some room to run.
by Georgia Raven on Mar 12, 2010 12:13 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I read an interview with Cam Cameron
where he was talking about going with four and five wide sets. The first thought that entered my head was “They can do that?” I don’t remember ever seeing the Ravens in a five wide, maybe for a Hail Mary in garbage time. This should be an interesting season.
"I wouldn't mind seeing someone erase my record of hitting into four triple plays" - Brooks
4 WR sets are just
smoke and mirrors for a curl pass to Mason or dump off to Rice.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Mar 12, 2010 3:45 PM EST up reply actions
Listening to a podcast of Todd McShay and Mel Kiper
And McShay was talking about Washington possibly trading their #4 overall pick for Gaither and said it is a very smart move for Washington. That would be a dream come true. We could trade out of that pick to somewhere in the mid first round or upper 20’s and get a few more 2nd and 3rd round picks.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
Ozzie would (for lack of a bettter phrase) blow his load if this happened. Forget trading down, draft Eric Berry.
Ehhh
Not so sure. That was actually the first thought that came to my mind, but trading the #4 overall pick could still get us a mid-late first and likely a 2nd and 3rd round pick.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
If we traded Gaither to that hell hole,
in DC, that would be great. He’d not come back to haunt us over there and then we trade out of that spot down to early teens, and get anotehr first and asecond, givinbg us two firsts and two seconds. That would play right into our GM Draft Guru’s hands and we’d be set with great young talent for a long time.
Come get Gaither, Daniel Snyder!
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Mar 12, 2010 3:47 PM EST up reply actions
I want to...
post something about Rufflesburger spreading someone’s legs, but I’ll stop there to keep it high brow.
Wow.
You just joined the Beatdown to say that?
Go jump on another Bandwagon… Celtics, Red Sox, and Steelers… can you say frontrunner?
That guy is the definition of a bandwagon jumping wanker!
"I kill myself in small amounts"
by StuckInUtah on Mar 12, 2010 4:47 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
MaLoR
I am going to add you on xbox and eat your shit in Halo at some point this weekend… if my wife lets me.
Not responding to you wagon rider. Go back to BTSC to discuss how Dennis Dixon is going to lead you to 12-4.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
sorry
dont think u can get dumber then u already are ravens fan making fun of the steelers hahahahahahaha what a joke
Hey celtsfan1 aka wanker
Why don’t you go f*** the bullet-holes in your trailer.
"I kill myself in small amounts"
by StuckInUtah on Mar 12, 2010 5:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Don't goad the troll
Feel free celtsfan to state your case, but come here just to start stuff gets you in trouble with the locval law here.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Mar 12, 2010 7:52 PM EST up reply actions
Hey
Cleveland currently has a better record than Boston. Are you sure you don’t want to change your name to cavsfan1? At least while they’re on top? You could always change it back if necessary…….wanker.
"I kill myself in small amounts"
by StuckInUtah on Mar 12, 2010 5:00 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I'll try
But its pretty hard to not envy a guy that doesn’t comprehend rooting for a “home team”. That’s got to be tough always rooting for the favorites. How do you ever manage?
"I kill myself in small amounts"
by StuckInUtah on Mar 12, 2010 5:07 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
with us getting boldin it’s now a pick your poison. either load up the box and get hurt in the passing game or play back and get pounded by our run game. Teams will still continue to load the box so now Flacco has no excuses to not having a big year. He is now in year 3 where QB’s tend to really start blossoming and he now has some weapons to throw too. I expect Flacco to make some big strides this year as well as our offense as a whole. We could easily be a top 10 offense and of course a top 5 defense. That just screams superbowl.
by AV23 on Mar 12, 2010 6:28 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
We're all just screaming
“Super Bowl!”
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Mar 12, 2010 7:53 PM EST up reply actions


















