What if? Ravens vs. Saints
Just dreaming about the possibilities if our Baltimore Ravens had upset the Indianapolis Colts and then went into the Meadowlands for one more game there and defeated the New York Jets to get to Super Bowl 44 in Miami in a couple of weeks. Many of us would be scrambling for tickets and reservations to South Beach and oh yeah, the Big Game. SB Nation has been fortunate enough to get media credentials for the lead writers of each Super Bowl team's blog (sorry guys) and I would be well on my way.
But how would our beloved Ravens fare in the game on the world stage against one of the best offenses in the league this year?
The Ravens went into New Orleans in 2006 and beat Drew Brees and some of the current guys 35-22. Brees actually had a great game against us, throwing for close to 400 yards and three TD's. However, he also threw three picks, with two of them being returned for touchdowns. In typical Ravens fashion, the Saints were limited to a total of 35 yards rushing, while Jamal Lewis led the Ravens rushing attack with 109 yards and Steve McNair played mistake-free football while throwing for two TD's. But it was the bend-but-don't-break defense that stiffened up in the Red Zone and came up with the game-changing turnovers that gave Baltimore the early lead and they never looked back.
If Baltimore wanted to have any chance in defeating this year's version of the Saints, they'd pretty much have to play an identical game to the one in 2006 if they expect to win this dream matchup. The defense knows that the Saints will air it out and they have so many weapons, the secondary would need a lot of help from the guys who normally get on the field once in a while (Frank Walker, ahem). There would have to be pressure on Brees and without the all-out blitzing that would expose our inability to cover one-on-one. A few tipped balls resulting in interceptions would be needed to combat the offensive fireworks we would expect to see. Limiting long gains from Reggie Bush and doing our best to keep the refs yellow bean bags in their waistbands would certainly help as well.
Offensively, Joe Flacco would need to make at least some attempts at showing he could air it out as well. The Saints were not that good of a run defense but you could be sure they would stack the line and dare Flacco to beat them. That would help New Orleans as they were among the best in the NFL at taking the ball away, with Darren Sharper leading the way. However, if Ray Rice were able to break through the line, he would have a great chance to rip off some huge gains.
Make no bones about it, this would be a tough matchup for Baltimore and New Orleans would certainly go into this game as the favorite, I'd say by 3.5 points. They say defense wins championships and this would have to be the case for the Ravens, but without a complementary offense, the Saints would overcome any turnovers by just throwing the ball to put enough points on the board to overcome anything we could muster. I'd like to think we would step up in this game and if we were able to hold down Peyton Manning and then the Jets offense, while scoring enough on New York's top rated defense, then we should be able to hang with anyone.
Anything can happen once you get to the next level and the Ravens certainly put it all together when they got to this point in 2001. While I'd never try to compare this year's defensive version to the 2000 one, we've played pretty solid the last part of the season and since this is my story, I'm picking the Ravens to get those needed turnovers and big games from Ray Rice with just enough from Joe Flacco to outlast the Saints and the Ravens stand atop the football world once again, 27-24!
0 recs |
47 comments
|
Comments
IF we could have beat Indy,
we could beat N.O. But we all know who was the better team in our game vs. Indy.
But this is a "what if"
and we are all allowed to dream, right?
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jan 26, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions
Alright, I'll enter the dream world...
If Tampa could beat them, I guess we could too. So I’m saying there’s chance….
Wishful thinking....if only we had the chance.
But I don’t mind. GO RAVENS!!!!!!
by Dfense4champs2052 on Jan 26, 2010 12:23 PM EST reply actions
I'm surprised the Ravens are losing in a poll on this site.
But I do think that the Ravens would win against NO. Hell, I think the Saints pretty much lost to the Vikings.
The Saints didn't beat the Vikings
The Vikings lost to the Saints. We Ravens fans should understand what that means, by the ways we found to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory so many times this season.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jan 26, 2010 4:15 PM EST up reply actions
It was a typical Favre move
lmaooo He does that alot! (Throw interceptions) I am glad to see the Saints in the SB, I hope they beat the pants off of the Colts! But in dreamland I would hope the Ravens would win, of course!!!
Lonely Ravens fan in Cheese Head country (Watertown, WI)
I think there is somewhat of a chance, however we don’t have no where near the fire power to keep up with them. You can slow them down, but it’s tough to stop them. If we had 3 picks for td’s maybe we would have a chance. I think bree’s would carve up our secondary even though ours has played a lot better. too many weapons on that team.
Teams that don’t know us fear us. We would have stomped the Saints. The teams who understand how we beat ourselves are the one’s who beat us consistantly. Unfotunately, we have to go threw the Colts, Pats and Steelers just to get to a Championship game. Basically, we have to navigate the 3 best QB’s in football just to have a chance.
The Saints FEAR you?!?
You would’ve stomped the Saints?
Wow, raven, that’s a pretty amazing perspective. Since nobody’s stomped the Saints this yr (although Dallas outplayed them and deserved the win on that day), I’d say your point of view is skewed. Remember, in 2006, the Saints couldn’t run the ball OR stop the long pass. This year, they’re better at both (although they still have problems stopping the run.)
And I know you aren’t the Jets, but remember earlier this season, we destroyed a quality defense; a team that matches up well with the Ravens.
Note that the Saints went through (not threw) Warner, Favre and next up is Peyton Manning. We destroyed Brady earlier this season. So navigating 3 of the best QBs in football was also on the Saints’ schedule. Luckily, the Saints already have one of the best QBs in the league.
Someday Flacco’s name may be included, but he needs a few receivers to improve his chances.
A few more receivers...
…a few more TD’s,….a few less INT’s,….a few more decent seasons to turn into GREAT seasons. Close, but sort of not close at all- yet.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jan 27, 2010 5:44 PM EST up reply actions
The Packers didn't know you but they went out and dominated you
The Vikings didn’t know you but they shot themselves in the foot and still beat you. You would definately need a much better defense AND passing game to beat the Saints.
by Donald Driver on Feb 1, 2010 9:03 PM EST up reply actions
Prayer Chain Needed
The Ravens are interviewing the space man Jim Zorn for QB coach. Please help stop this. It will be just another softy coach in our arsenal.
Zorn may actually be a decent QB coach
just like Cam was a great offensive coordinator but a horrible head coach. Wait a minute….
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jan 26, 2010 7:49 PM EST up reply actions
What a retarded statement
The night is darkest right before the dawn
by Baltimore Warrior on Jan 26, 2010 8:05 PM EST up reply actions
The Skins O-line stunk. Campbell was a baby. Hard to tell what kind of coach Zorn was. Foggy man, very foggy. Kind of like Cam. Just can’t write them off or celebrate their existance.
He was a solid QB coach
for Hasselbeck in Seattle, in Matt’s “good” years.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jan 27, 2010 8:57 AM EST up reply actions
I disagree raven
I was having this conversation with some friends earlier. I think Zorn would be a better fit at QB coach than Jackson was. Zorn was just like Joe when he played. Great arm and just had a few bum WR the throw to outside of Largent.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
Having a conversation with 3 hampsters and a skink hardly substantiates your argument.
Besides, I never heard of Hue Jackson until he left. What did he do exactly? Show Flacco how to read D’s? Stretch the field? Scramble? Be prepared on 3rd and long? Check blitzes? Oh yeah, feed Ray Rice and cheere. I remember him now.
I wonder if thereis a learning curve for a QB
when the QB coach is left handed, because of the “opposite” effect.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jan 27, 2010 8:58 AM EST up reply actions
Flacco’s been running the wrong way from sacks all year so maybe a lefty can lead him in the opposite direction. Hey…maybe Joe is left handed and just misdiagnosed.
He needs to learn how to
step up into the pocket, not just fold like a lawn chair under pressure every time.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jan 27, 2010 5:44 PM EST up reply actions
joe has the ugliest sacks. he doesn’t really get popped out of his shoes but just kind of lurches and gives up like a wildebeast in a crocs mouth.
He folds over, grimaces and just waits
for someone to fall on him to knock him into the ground.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jan 28, 2010 9:23 AM EST up reply actions
I wish Zorn just stayed Zorn the retired QB. I wanted to remember him as a decent QB from Canada Minor. Just foggy memories of a team that played in a dark stadium with bad astroturf. He had the white guy to throw to. Ahh, the old days. But, the space man had to ruin those little memories and become a head coach who telegraphs fake kicks and punts. Now we might be watching him pace our sidelines talking to his velcro Pumas.
Hey raven
Another ACC stomping by the Terps tonight at home. 4-1 in the ACC and in first place. Got any smart ass remarks to say?
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
The Terps' "Worst"
is yet to come. Just wait, that crash you’ll hear is their .500 season in the ACC.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jan 27, 2010 8:59 AM EST up reply actions
I hope you stub your toe today
All of you will be bowing to me when we get the bye in the ACC tournament.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
Not likely
This is by far the deepest and most balanced terps team since the championship team. Not saying they are as good as them, just that they have that depth. 3 deep in “big guys”. 4 great shooters. 6 or 7 guys who can shoot the three, 5 guys who can rebound, 4 guys who can dish it. This team is good in a down year for the ACC.
"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight
Thank you!
Man, had to get a steeler to explain it to these hard heads.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
Wait until they play a good team
and if they can win on Tobacco Road, I’ll be impressed.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jan 27, 2010 5:46 PM EST up reply actions
Knocked off FSU when they were ranked 19. We have 3 straight ACC games were we held the other team to under 65 points. I dont care who it is, if you are holding a conference opponent to under 65 points in 3 straight games, that is a great team you have there.
We destroyed Miami last night and they started the season 15-1!
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
But even you know
it’s how you finish, plus the ACC Tourney. Let’s not even talk about this until they are finishing up their conference schedule.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jan 28, 2010 9:24 AM EST up reply actions
You should have seen him Saturday night after they smashed NC State. Him and 5 other players were at the bar and Grevis was acting like a drunken fool.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
They were living it up….they finally beat an ACC team and they wre trying to forget their loss to Boys Latin.
And I bet you didn’t think they would beat UNC last year either. What were you saying after that game?
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
I just looked at your page
You’re a Bucks fan???
by Donald Driver on Feb 1, 2010 9:08 PM EST up reply actions
Wow, 50-50 at 9am
Both teams have 103 votes each as of this morning. Guess that makes it an even game, based on us experts’ opinions!
aka 'Rexx'
I know Preston and Hensley didn't vote here
Because they cannot pick against the Ravens technically. Poor guys, what are they going to write about now?
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
Saints by 40
"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

















