Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Peyton Manning Medically Cleared To Resume NFL Career

Big Name Wide Receiver Might Not Make The Difference

For all of us who have been clamoring for a big name wide receiver, such as Denver's Brandon Marshall, Arizona's Anquan Boldin, or even Buffalo's Terrell Owens, the addition of such a name might not make any difference in the Baltimore Ravens' passing game. Currently and historically in the entire decade, the Ravens air attack has been one of the lower ranked in the league and despite the addition of what is supposed to be our future Franchise Quarterback, the ranking has not significantly improved.

Proportionately, it has pretty much the same statistics as it did last year, but the team just threw the ball more times than it did last season, approximately 30% more in 2009 than in 2008. However, this is still a run-first offense and the emergence of second year running back Ray Rice has overshadowed the same in second year QB Joe Flacco. Due to Rice's success, Flacco not only hands him the ball more often, but also looks for him out of the backfield more than anyone else on the team.

So what difference will a big name, star quality WR make on the Ravens?

Star-divide

Probably not much, at least at first, as both the QB and his receiver will need to get acclimated with each other and that takes time for a young QB. However, even with his maturity, the connection he makes with his wideouts depends partly on his abilities as well as the leadership from the coaches who make the offensive decisions on the sidelines. Let's look at some of the examples of QB's that have been successful without that star wide receiver.

Tom Brady won three Super Bowls with the New England Patriots, all without that big name guy to throw to. Even when Randy Moss entered the fray, the Patriots had an undefeated regular season and both Brady and Moss set individual records at their positions, but they still have not hoisted the Lombardi Trophy together. Donovan McNabb made the Super Bowl with TO and lost, but he also made a bunch of NFC Championship Games without him.

Sure, Peyton Manning has Reggie Wayne and Dallas Clark and had Marvin Harrison, but he has made great wide receivers out of no-names such as Brandon Stokley, Anthony Gonzalez, Austin Collie and Pierre Garcon. New Orlean's Drew Brees has put up huge numbers, with guys who were relatively unknown coming out of college in Marques Colston, Devery Henderson and Robert Meacham.

Even Dallas' Tony Romo, despite his inability to get deep into the post season, has enjoyed a prolific passing game with just guys such as Miles Austin and Patrick Crayton. Look what the veteran Brett Favre did to Minnesota's relatively poor passing game with receivers such as Sidney Rice, Bernard Berrian and Visanthe Shiancoe?

My point is not that I am even beginning to compare the Ravens' Joe Flacco to these NFL stars, but just trying to understand what looks like a trend that the better QB's make the WR's, not the other way around. Teams that win the Super Bowl, much less compete for it year after year, are those with veteran quarterbacks, not necessarily those with star wide receivers. My point being that until Flacco grows up over the years, the reps and the experience that these guys have earned, the addition of a big name wide receiver may not make the difference that so many fans, as well as local female radio hosts covet as the answer to all our problems.

Perhaps too much blame is being heaped upon the Ravens second year QB, but that position can absolutely make or break a team's chances to get to the pinnacle of the game. At the same time, the fanfare surrounding Flacco's arrival has put the spotlight a bit brighter on him than perhaps it should be. Not helping the situation was the emphasis on the passing game that we saw throughout the season which appeared to be a classic case of "too much, too soon." Perhaps as the experience continues, Flacco will rise to the level where he can better "manage" a game and then the addition of a big name receiver will only further his progress. But adding one right at this point, might just not make the difference that many would expect and then where would that leave Joe and his lofty status amongst the Ravens' fanbase?

Flacco might actually be better off with a young receiver with big potential to grow with and develop that connection we spoke about earlier, than to just plug in a star name and expect the results to be spectacular. Everyone could end up very disappointed if that were to happen. Ravens GM Ozzie Newsome knows what he is doing and will put the parts together for this team that will support Flacco's progression, and not just hide his inefficiencies at this point of his young career.

Comment 99 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This makes a lot of sense.

But it looks like there will be an opportunity to make some changes in the receiving corps this offseason, and I think things need to be shuffled around a litte. Clayton had his chance, I don’t think he’s lived up to what we’ve all expected. Kelley Washington was, well, Kelly Washington. I don’t know anything about Marcus Smith, and Demetrius Williams seems to be made of porcelain. Todd Heap is aging. I think drafting AND signing a WR would be a great help, assuming Mason won’t be returning. I’d like a guy with a physical presence because it seems Ravens WRs had a hard time getting open against better defenses. May as well do it the Raven way and try to out-muscle people in the passing game too (thats why I love Brandon Marshall as far fetched as the idea may be). Also, let’s use the draft to get a speed WR to catch the long ball so we can spread out secondaries and open things up underneath. I wonder if we even have a coach capable of grooming a rookie WR tho…Demetrius Williams never developed, nor has Clayton, Marcus Smith isnt even seen. Our best WRs were veterans who were brought in.

by OldBay83 on Jan 21, 2010 9:20 AM EST reply actions  

No way he'll be there when we pick

He’ll go in the top 10-15 and we won’t be picking until around 25th.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 21, 2010 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

If he falls too 20, oh yea

Probably the same thing as last year with Oher falling, not gonna happen with Bryant though. He’s the #1 rated WR in the draft.

by BmoreBlitz on Jan 22, 2010 8:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Offense is young. The O-line needs more experience as well. Flacco needs better receivers (not a single superstar). The Ravens spent the last half of the decade playing the game that won in the first three or so years of the decade. Defense could more readily dictate a game before the Colts had the PI rule interpretation changed. My opinion is the rule change allowed average receivers to perform much better – hence you see decent QBs who can pass doing well. The Ravens, for want of a better QB or now for lack of decent receivers, never adjusted to the new game. This year was tough because the defensive weakness were precisely where the game now favors the offense – in the secondary. Webb looks like he was coming on and Carr did OK. I hope they can find another decent CB and a decent receiver or two to help Flacco and the Ravens start playing football that acknowledges the rules favor teams that have a competent passing game. They better do it in a hurry, as the defense is getting old.

by drj on Jan 21, 2010 9:44 AM EST reply actions  

I disagree

All of the receivers listed as listed at “unknown” college players have consistently caught the ball. While Flacco didn’t have a stellar year, his numbers looked much worse than they were because his receivers looked like Featherstone from Necessary Roughness (for those of you that don’t remember the movie, he couldn’t catch a cold). It doesn’t so much matter whether we get a veteran stud wide receiver or draft a good one, but we need a Sidney Rice/Reggie Wayne type who WILL hold onto the ball if thrown anywhere near him. Clayton shows flashes of brilliance, but also drops some really easy passes. He’s also not tall, standing at about 5’9, I believe. Mason is reliable, but we can’t count on him much longer, and can’t expect him to be open if he’s the only real threat we have out there.

by daveskis2001 on Jan 21, 2010 9:50 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Although bringing in a big name receiver might not make a world of difference, its still something the front office needs to address. Because how could bringing in a guy that’s better at his position then anyone we currently have, be a bad thing. Mason, Clayton, and Williams could all potentially not be playing for Baltimore next season. So I ask you, what better time to overhaul the receiving corps?

by StuckInUtah on Jan 21, 2010 10:28 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Silly thing is

that all three of those guys might go onto decent success in a different uniform, and I can see it happening next season.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 21, 2010 8:03 PM EST up reply actions  

big name receiver will have an effect even if they can’t get him he ball. we need to get the D off Rice.

by raven on Jan 23, 2010 8:05 PM EST up reply actions  

We need all three types of WR

We still need a burner ( a pure speed guy who can stretch the field), a tall possesion receiver (maybe kelley washington is good enough), and a tall high pointer(someone Joe can throw to in the endzone for fades and such). None of current WR’s fit any of these molds great yet. We need to have an amazing draft at the skill positions. This is a WR heavy draft and there are some great picks to be made. Maybe we can sign Malcom Floyd too and get that high pointer.

Also on the wish list: Dexter McCluster out of Ole Miss, looks like the next Chris Johnson. He’s only rated a 66 out of 100 on scouts inc which would make him a 4th rounder. Once he runs the 40 at the combine his stock will go way up though.

by BmoreBlitz on Jan 21, 2010 10:53 AM EST reply actions  

Lets face facts

Sure,we need a couple of receivers.I agree that we need big,strong receivers with speed,along the lines of a Brandon Marshall. I’d rather draft one though so we don’t get the attitude that comes with a proven receiver. We also need a tight end. I love Heap but he is getting up there in age and his frequent injuries don’t help.We don’t have his replacement on the team as of now. But the biggest problem we have is in cutting down the stupid,needless mistakes such as pass interference calls and unnecessary roughness calls. These penalties killed us all season long and lead to both touchdowns in the game against the colts. We have a lot of work to do and filling holes,while needed is only part of the problem.pass protection could use some improvement,too.

it's better to be feared than to be loved

by purple and black attack on Jan 21, 2010 10:59 AM EST reply actions  

wow

you at as if heap turning 55 you just about to turn 30 but he had a great season this year he played mostly ever game and made big touchdowns for the team we don’t need a tight end maybe we need a wr but you got to think about this we still have other wideouts like eron riley demetrius williams, justin harper, and etc that can become big time in this league i think demetrius williams had a good game this year he made good catches and big touch downs yeah he drop a couple of balls i belive only twice or so didn’t the great derrick mason drop a ball that just happens sometime

by jazz20 on Jan 21, 2010 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Definitely need a TE

to get open and actually get YAC, which Heap no longer does.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 21, 2010 8:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Heap has definitely lost some of his ability.

It was obvious. He wasn’t the same guy as last season.

by Psychropod on Jan 22, 2010 9:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Heap had two good games,

both with two TD catches each. Other than that, both games towards the end of the season (Chicago/Pitt), he was virtually invisible most of the season and seems so slow getting into his pattern and is pretty easy to cover now by almost anyone, a LB, safety or nickel back.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 22, 2010 10:16 AM EST up reply actions  

McCLuster is the real deal and a steal

Mark my words. This guy is unreal. With him and Rice on the field at the same time you might not have to throw more than dinks and dunks. I saw him for 2 seconds on a short college film clip and that’s all I needed to see. He is blazing fast and super quick. He also has a great message to DB’s after he scores -"You’ve just been Mccluster f……….! " LOL.

Looking at the Manning/Flacco photo it’s obvious why Joe isn’t as good as Manning. He needs bigger shoulder pads. It’s all in the shoulder pads.

I agree with Bruce and it isn’t always a change in receiver that will send you forward. Our crew this year was servicable and they got usually got open when Cam wanted them to get open. Without the deep plays they just got sat on. If you notice, when we targeted Heap he usually caught it (no YAC of course). When we threw to D-Will he was usually open (dropped of course). When we went to Clayton he had decent separation. Mason was there all day for Joe. It comes down to being cool in the pocket.

1/2 of Favre’s TD’s aren’t the designed play. He extends the play and looks for the 4th and 5th opportunity. Joe isn’t there yet and may not be mobil enough to do that. Joe needs to know when to step up in the pocket and when to roll out. He’s better off stepping up and buying 1 more second because he’s not quick enough to roll out.

Great receivers will help but they will not fair much better without Joe improving his vision and footwork.

by raven on Jan 21, 2010 11:14 AM EST reply actions  

McCluster?

Are you for real? He is just another version of Jayson Foster who we cut before this season. 5’8" 175 pounds, he is too small man. He will get demolished in the NFL. I have see tape on him, and the only way he ever gets big yards is without getting touched. Get a hand on him and he is down.

McCluster will be lucky to go in the 6th-7th round. Wait till you see the WR i got brewing up.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jan 21, 2010 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Dez Bryant!!!!!!!!!!!

Dam I can’t wait untill the draft!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by Zachary Beard on Jan 21, 2010 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

There's no way in hell you guys even sniff Dez Bryant

He won’t slide past the skidmarks. Even if they retain Cribbs, he won’t be happy, and they need another playmaker besides Harrison on that abortion of an offense.

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 23, 2010 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

McCluster is Jayson Foster?

BAHAHA!!!, Foster played in Division 2 at Georgia Southern. McCluster plays in the SEC, the confernce known for fast and good defense…. He makes those defenses look like high schoolers. You can’t get your hands on him, he’s too fast. Oh yea he still drops a shoulder on ppl to finish runs. 6th or 7th round, what a joke. he’ll be gone by 3rd round at latest.

by BmoreBlitz on Jan 22, 2010 8:51 AM EST up reply actions  

The Big Need In Baltimore

From the outside looking in, the Ravens offense tends to bog down when teams know you are in obviuos passing situations (they simply role the coverage to Mason) and say who else on this Ravens Wr corps threatens us or can beat us. The answer is no one. The film has shown this over the course of the last two years. The OC deserves some blame for how your season progressed as he moved away from the offensive personnel and formations that produce the early success of Flacco.

The NFL is a passing and Qb-driving league and right now the Ravens are not equipped to compete at the highest levels with a mediocre (at best) Wr corps. A big-time Wr needs to be brought in to " tilt " the coverage and dictate match-ups favorable to the Ravens offense. Umbrella coverages will continue to be employed by oppossing defenses until this happens.

Flacco is a fabulous young Qb with a big-time arm to throw all the passes on the NFL passing tree (love how he drills the football into the Wr hands on those isolation routes towards the sidelines.) What’s the point in having a Qb with the talent of a Flacco and not provide him the weapons neccessary to maximize his great Qb skill-set.

I find it amazing as a football fan that the Ravens FO and Ozzie Newsome did not try harder to get an Anquan Boldin or Brandon Marshall to help aid in the develpoement the rifled- arm Flacco. Talented Wr’s in addition to dictating coverage take pressure off young Qb’s by being where they are suppose to be and CATCHING the football when thrown to them. I believe this has been a problem. One that Mason has even contributed to.

The window is closing. “Sugar” Ray won’t be around forever to lead your defense and Mason is set to do his dance (retirement). The Ravens FO needs to get someone in there to make the Ravens offense more balanced and thereby making it less predictable with more exploisiveness. Bandon Marshall would be great if his baggage is not an issue; however the compensation would be higher for a Brandon Marshall ( #1 and #3.) Now Anquan Boldin can probably be had for #2. If others teams become interested it would go to a #2 and #5. Getting someone, anyone with talent, will be a tremendous help to the young franchise Qb moving forward.

Oh yes, one more thing, Boldin would be a great Raven. Would fit right in with the group. No assembly required.

by Cardsfan81 on Jan 21, 2010 11:49 AM EST reply actions  

Great points,all dead on!

and if we had a TE who could open the deeper middle CONSISTENTLY and get YAC, we would be better on the receiving edges as well. Heap is decent but gets zero YAC and is so inconsistent as he disappears for long stretches.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 21, 2010 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

Heap did play well down the strech but you are correct that he does not threaten the deep middle like he did in his prime. He does not have that kind of “juice” anymore. LJ was a dissapointment and a non-factor. The draft maybe the Ravens best answer for this problem.

by Cardsfan81 on Jan 21, 2010 9:05 PM EST up reply actions  

If Oklahoma's Gresham is there

when we pick, I say go get him!

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 22, 2010 9:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Agree but hesitant with getting burned by an injured Boldin.

I like you comment about ’what’s the point having Flacco..without receivers." So true. If you wanted to dink and dunk and hope for 3rd down success, then Troy Smith was a better answer. Flacco is built to go donw field. I dog Joe but I do realize he is being used at barely 3/4 capability.

by raven on Jan 21, 2010 12:03 PM EST reply actions  

+1 about boldin not being the answer.

Give me Streve Breaston or Early Doucet before Boldin. Boldin’s contract and injury issues make him not worth it. Can we trade for Pierre Garcon please!

by BmoreBlitz on Jan 21, 2010 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

No need for any of that

Are you basing your need for Breaston and Doucet off that playoff game against GB? They are alright WR, but not the #1 that we MUST start finding.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jan 21, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

+1 Mr MaLoR

I don’t just watch the Cardinals but the entire league. The Ravens need an established alpha male Wr now! Breaston’s a good player who may already be at his ceiling. I don’t think he has the ability to be a #1 (not physical or strong enough.) Breaston also did not show much on ST’s during the season as a punt returner. More East-West running than North-South.

Doucet has some Boldin qualities but lacks Q’s overall talent. Doucet’s ceiling is 2a-3a in my opinion. I dont’ see Ozzie aquiring #2a or #3 types.

by Cardsfan81 on Jan 21, 2010 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I dont’ see Ozzie aquiring #2a or #3 types.

We have been doing this since 1996. Where the hell have you been?

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jan 21, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Please stop trying to compare the success

that any Cards receiver had catching balls from Warner to catching them from Flacco. That does not just carry over from one QB to another!

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 21, 2010 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Flacco

Bruce, I get the impression that you are not a Flacco fan. Flacco did not play well towards the end of the season and made some mistakes in games that cost the team but his up-side is huge. Some question his leadership skills. The question I would ask is———can the Baltimore Ravens be Flacco’s team with Ray Lewis and Ed Reid garnering so much attention and spotlight?

A Qb needs help to make it his team……. does Flacco have the pieces around him to this happen? The answer for me is a resounding no! Flacco is a young player still developing in the mental aspects of the game. It takes time AND the proper coaching to get to the level of upper-echelon Qb in the NFL.

by Cardsfan81 on Jan 21, 2010 9:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I am indeed a Flacco fan, but

am not satisfied with his progress this year, nor how he was handled by the coaching staff. Early in the season they put too much on him but by the end of the season they made him feel afraid to go for it and his poise that was such a strong point last year, became unraveled. I need to see a big step up in big games from him next year to get both feet on the bandwagon.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 22, 2010 9:14 AM EST up reply actions  

This is the same thing I have been saying.

I believe Flacco’s problem is that he is being stifled. He needs to know that he can “wing it” when necessary, because that’s when the big plays will happen. This is what great QBs do. They are confident because their coaches and teams have confidence in them. Better WRs will help, but I think the bigger problem is the coaching. I want to see Cam go.

And playing through injuries hasn’t helped either. This shows they also had no confidence in T. Smith to get the job done while Flacco was hurt. As a result, we will probably not only be lacking in WR and TE, but also a #2 QB, when Smith leaves. Not to mention the holes in the defense that’s getting…um…old…

We are so screwed next season.

by Psychropod on Jan 22, 2010 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Actually, John Beck

would be a solid #2 QB and we can once again bring in a “Drew Willy” type as a 3rd string.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 22, 2010 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

That is a thought, but honestly

I have no opinion of him because I’ve never seen him play.

by Psychropod on Jan 22, 2010 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

He knows Cam's system

and has been here a year now. Started a few games at Miami when they were real bad.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 22, 2010 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Drew Willy

The player that Mel Kiper said would become the next Tom Brady.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jan 22, 2010 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Okay, but I was talking about John Beck. LOL

I knew he was our 3rd-stringer, but I didn’t watch the games he played. (That is, if it was me you were talking to. )

by Psychropod on Jan 22, 2010 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

And about Garcon

He has Peyton Manning. Stephen Hawkings could look good playing WR for the Colts.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jan 21, 2010 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

haha nice Hawking comment,

Garcon is a burner and physical. He’s in his second year and still is getting better. Once his route running gets tweaked he’ll be home run hitter.

I’ve always like Breaston, fast, versatile, runs good routes, not afraid to go over the middle, and Qb friendly WR that finds the soft spots. Can help in the return game too.

Doucet finally got a real oppurtunity and took advantage of it. He’s tall, physical and fast.

None of these guys are guarenteed # 1’s. But they all get the important YAC that our current group gets none of. The only player on our team that makes ppl miss is Rice(and McGahee sometimes).

by BmoreBlitz on Jan 21, 2010 12:28 PM EST reply actions  

The QBs throwing to Boldin, Garcon, etc.

are not Flacco, as those QB’s could make All Pro’s out of Mason, Clayton and probably D-Will as well. Just watch and see what happens when those guys go elsewhere.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 21, 2010 8:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Ravens Wr's

The most important and fundamental diffrence between Ravens Wr’s and Boldin, Garcon or whoever we want to mention is the ability to consistently catch the football. Raves Wr’s don’t do this and this hurt the offense and the Qb specifically.

by Cardsfan81 on Jan 21, 2010 9:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Can't agree this is anymore of a problem

than other teams have and that is not helping but not THE issue.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 22, 2010 9:15 AM EST up reply actions  

its true

good quarterbacks make their receivers good. and not trying to argue, but flacco kinda helped do that with heap and partly mason. mason has always been good, but flacco has kept him up in the 1000 yards receiving. and everyone was talking about how heap has lost his thunder, but towards the end of the season he began turning into a great redzone target for flacco. our problem is that those are our only two. clayton has failed to live up to his 1st round draft pick status. washington was a good third receiver, but thats all he’ll ever be. and williams just can’t seem to step his game up.
personally, i would like to see us grab a receiver, whether in the draft or in free agency, with some size as well as speed. all our receiver are under 6 foot, and that kinda helps with our problem. i would love to see us grab brandon marshall, but there is a slim chance of that happening with shanahan in washington. in the draft, i hope we can grab arrelious benn from illinois. the guy is like 6’2 220 lbs with a ton of speed and great hands. either way, we need a legitimate threat in the passing game to relieve the pressure every team puts on rice

by Ravens4Life on Jan 21, 2010 12:37 PM EST reply actions  

I still kick myself knowing that Ozzie drafted Clayton before Roddy White AND Vincent Jackson in 2005 AND drafted Demetrius Williams before Brandon Marshall in the 4th round in 2006. All these problems would not be happening right now if you did not make those bonehead moves. Ozzie knows how to evaluate them, right?

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jan 21, 2010 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

it's the WR scouts below ozzie that can't get it right

All the scouts have to sell their favorite players to Ozzie. Yes he makes the final decision on them but our lower level scouts are selling the wrong people. You can’t knock Ozzie too much for missing Brandon Marshall. Even Denver missed on him because they waited till the 4th rd to draft a 1st talent. It happens.

by BmoreBlitz on Jan 21, 2010 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

now that i didnt know. that is unbelievable. those are both receivers with great size and skill, and he chose small little clayton. ozzie is a great evaluator, but he needs to step his game up on what receivers to draft

by Ravens4Life on Jan 21, 2010 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Wouldn't matter who we picked

Look at the QB’s that have been throwing their way.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 21, 2010 8:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Marcus Smith

I think it’s a shame we didn’t get to see more of Marcus Smith this year. He seemed to be having a really good camp up until he was injured, and with the amount of playing time the likes of D Williams and Kelley Washington saw this year, it could’ve been a big year for him. He seemed to be a good prospect with decent size (6ft 1, 215lbs), so hopefully he’ll get his chance next season. I also like the look of benn, but Thomas from Georgia Tech looked like a beast last season when they decided to pass the ball.

Nobody who ever gave his best regretted it...

by Irish Ravens on Jan 21, 2010 12:50 PM EST reply actions  

He has stone hands

Marcus Smith will never be a good WR, he can’t catch.

by BmoreBlitz on Jan 21, 2010 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Not fair and not true!

He caught 94 balls his senior season, which unfortunately was his last injury free season. He could be good, but I doubt we’ll get that chance and neither will he.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 21, 2010 8:18 PM EST up reply actions  

He looked terrible in preseason last year before he got hurt

His whole rookie year he didn’t make catch…. now he’s coming off a major knee injury. All he can do is block. I’m guessing he won’t be confident in his hard cuts this upcoming year. The only way he’s making an impact is special teams. Not what our team is looking for from a WR right now.

by BmoreBlitz on Jan 22, 2010 8:34 AM EST up reply actions  

If he can stay healthy,

he can make the team next season. “IF”

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 22, 2010 9:16 AM EST up reply actions  

The League Has Changed

Flacco has done very well in his second year. He shattered every single franchise record for the position. Sure his averages only moved up slightly, but they moved up slightly on way more passes. Passing more should decrease your averages (since the defense expects it and the passes are tougher). Meanwhile, our running game could be more successful because we had some passing.

The league has changed. The rules today favor big shoot out QBs. Running the ball and playing defense has its place, but its just not where the league is today and trying to recreate the 2000 Ravens isn’t going to work. We need a solid passing game, and they means two solid receivers so that we don’t get completely shut down but a star corner or dedicated double team.

I agree flacco’s big arm is being wasted on the current crop. Our run game has set up some very good long bombs and our receivers haven’t been able to capitalize on those opportunities.

by davver on Jan 21, 2010 1:12 PM EST reply actions  

No he didn't!

He had the second best Ravens statistical season, nowhere near the best Vinny had here in the late ’90’s. Not even close.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 21, 2010 8:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Hue Jackson leaving?
Jackson to Leave Joe and the Ravens?

Ravens Quarterbacks Coach Hue Jackson could be coaching former Oakland No. 1 overall pick JaMarcus Russell instead of Baltimore’s Joe Flacco next season.

Oakland Raiders insider Jerry McDonald confirmed that Jackson was in Alameda, Calif., the location of the Raiders’ team headquarters, talking to team officials yesterday.

"The Jackson visit, I’m assured, is a lock," proclaimed McDonald, an NFL writer for the Bay Area News Group.

While the Raiders deny talking to anybody for the head coaching position, the Oakland Tribune established Jackson spent several hours interviewing for a job other than the one still held by Tom Cable. Both NFL.com’s Jason La Canfora and ESPN’s Adam Schefter reported that Jackson is a candidate for the offensive coordinator position.

"Jackson wouldn’t be in the building if he’s not a serious candidate to be something," McDonald said. "Since [Raiders executive] John Herrera said earlier today the Raiders have interviewed no head coaching candidates but have fielded calls from assistants, we’ll assume the reports about him being interviewed as a candidate for offensive coordinator are accurate.

"Whether Jackson is under contract or not doesn’t matter much. The Ravens simply deny permission if he’s under contract, or perhaps they’ve already agreed in writing he could leave for a coordinator’s spot. He’s not here unless he’s available to be hired."

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jan 21, 2010 1:23 PM EST reply actions  

I don't understand how you aren't looking at a WR...

You most likely need to get him through the draft, since the new CBA won’t let you add a FA until someone signs a player off your roster (and for that same amount of cash).

Anyway, comparing any QB to Manning or Brees is seriously flawed off the bat. Unless, you honestly think Flacco is as good as them, or as developed as them, having that argument is a poor one to have. Flacco simply is not them, and might never be, considering Peyton is the best QB the NFL has ever seen IMO.

Wayne, Colston, and Moss would be good no matter where they went. Crayton is still bad. Austin is a rare case of unknown hidden talent (see Brady). As far as the Vikings go…I don’t see validity in that argument considering their QBs last year were Tarvaris Jackson (SUCKS!) and Gus Frerrote (SUCKS!). Any QB could have made that situation better. But, they didn’t just get “any” QB, they got a guy who holds many of the all-time passing records and a sure 1st ballot HoFer.

Anyway, all these teams you listed have a great WR. Colts-Wayne, Pats-Moss, Saints-Colston, Vikings-Rice, Cowgirls-Austin. Every year that the Ravens go by without drafting/signing a true #1 WR, I breath a sigh of relief. So please, don’t sign Marshall, Boldin, etc and don’t draft anyone.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by John Stephens on Jan 21, 2010 2:45 PM EST reply actions  

So please, don’t sign Marshall, Boldin, etc and don’t draft anyone.

Ozzie Newsome hasn’t had a problem with this in the past, what makes you think he will fix it now?

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jan 21, 2010 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes a big name WR will help

You can never point the finger at one player when your team fails so I can’t blame Joe Flacco for the disappointing season. There that should make the Flacco supporters happy. Yes he had good numbers here and there and yes he is young, and yes he shows promise BUT I am not a believer. I want a QB to show leadership. I want to think when we have two minutes left and need a TD that “Yes we will win this game!” Face the facts – Flacco is NOT a leader. A gifted athlete he is. A possible winner some day in the NFL maybe. I am sorry folks but this is the NFL not little league – we need results now, not 3 years from now. You make it or you don’t, you find ways to win or you don’t. I keep hearing that Flacco is still young or that he was injured. Well both may be true but they are excuses. I admit he had 6 dropped passes in the last game and no one can blame Joe for that. Think about that one drive we were able to muster. He threw the ball straight between the numbers of the Colts CB and it was dumb luck that it wasn’t 7 points for the Colts.

The offensive line shows promise. Someone said Ogden used to handle Freeney – the last few times he faced Freeney he was eaten alive. The man is tough to block and Gaither is going to be fine. It still seems Flacco is a sitting duck back there. Maybe he should watch some Fran Tarkenton videos and find out how to scramble. I am not saying bench him, I am just wondering when he is going to take charge. No one said “Ray Lewis is just a second year player, he may be a leader one day.” That man lead from day one and that is what true leaders do. Stop making excuses for Joe.

Ok so the question was will a big name WR help Flacco? OF COURSE it would! Maybe Manning can make great receivers now but I don’t think Joe can. We NEED someone who scares the opposing defense. We NEED someone the other team thinks could break the game open every time he runs a route. Fear is a great motivator and if you must double team a great receiver every play – someone is not going to be able to cover another receiver as well. Clayton shows me nothing. Yeah he has a good game once in a while but he is a third receiver. Someone is not getting open out there and we need someone who can go out and get open fast and hold onto the ball. Act like Mason will retire soon because he will. Clayton, Williams and Washington are not good enough to get a Super Bowl. Get Brandon Marshall and get him now. He does have an attitude but he caught 100 passes and he is big. We need at least one tall receiver. Boldin is injury prone. Some college guys may be good but it is hit or miss. Throw Marshall in there and watch Joe find him. I don’t trust Newsome to find a great receiver. Getting Mason was a great move but name me another memorable receiver the Ravens have ever had aside from Mason. Michael Jackson? lol By the way, how much did we pay LJ Smith to do absolutely nothing this year? Give Joe a few real targets and it can only help! I will support Joe but believe he needs better targets.

by Rayfan1 on Jan 21, 2010 2:53 PM EST reply actions  

It might help, but...

to expect a better receiver to make a Pro Bowler out of Flacco might be a stretch and they might have issues themselves repeating any season that got them here in the first place. We are not built or managed to be a pass-happy team.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 21, 2010 8:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Why not

We got a talented young O-line, and a decent WR corps, all we need is the one “The Guy” to make the WRs corp Great.

by Zachary Beard on Jan 21, 2010 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

We would need

a major “philosophy” change and get Flacco to buy into not checking down to Rice so quickly all the time and keep his eyes focused downfield.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 22, 2010 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Impressive

Bruce,

You have a lot of substance in this article. Your Bloging skills go beyond baltimore beatdown. I hope Ozzie reads this from time to time and offers you a job on his staff.

by bladeszeenie on Jan 21, 2010 3:33 PM EST reply actions  

Wow, wouldn' that be great!

I’d never forget you guys if I made the move to the “Show!”

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 21, 2010 8:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks, guys, you’re making me blush!

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 22, 2010 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

maybe ozzie will make me president of HR then….

don’t go to the dark side bruce. you’ll turn into jerry sundusky and start the rhyming cliche blogs…“diddle dee ddidle do flacco has no one to throw to”. “go to the well too often, find it dry and only penny’s on the bottom as flacco throws a pick in traffic diddle dee diddle do”…………don’t do it bruce.

by raven on Jan 22, 2010 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Put me out of my misery

before then if I ever start leaning that way!

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 23, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Flacco on track to be elite, have patience

Do you guys really think Flacco is doing that bad in his second year? Here is a comparison to “the greats”.

Joe Flacco
YEAR TEAM G CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT RAT
2008 BAL 16 257 428 60.0 2971 6.9 14 70 12 80.3
2009 BAL 16 315 499 63.1 3613 7.2 21 72 12 88.9

Btw, do you see a single statistic that didn’t show improvement this year? All with crappy receivers.

Tom Brady
YEAR TEAM G CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT RAT
2001 NWE 15 264 413 63.9 2843 6.9 18 91 12 86.5
2002 NWE 16 373 601 62.1 3764 6.3 28 49 14 85.7
2003 NWE 16 317 527 60.2 3620 6.9 23 82 12 85.9

Peyton Manning
YEAR TEAM G CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT RAT
1998 IND 16 326 575 56.7 3739 6.5 26 78 28 71.2
1999 IND 16 331 533 62.1 4135 7.8 26 80 15 90.7
2000 IND 16 357 571 62.5 4413 7.7 33 78 15 94.7
2001 IND 16 343 547 62.7 4131 7.6 26 86 23 84.1

Philip Rivers
YEAR TEAM G CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT RAT
2006 SDG 16 284 460 61.7 3388 7.4 22 57 9 92.0
2007 SDG 16 277 460 60.2 3152 6.9 21 49 15 82.4
2008 SDG 16 312 478 65.3 4009 8.4 34 67 11 105.5
2009 SDG 16 317 486 65.2 4254 8.8 28 81 9 104.4

Drew Brees
YEAR TEAM G CMP ATT PCT YDS AVG TD LNG INT RAT
2002 SDG 16 320 526 60.8 3284 6.2 17 52 16 76.9
2003 SDG 11 205 356 57.6 2108 5.9 11 68 15 67.5
2004 SDG 15 262 400 65.5 3159 7.9 27 79 7 104.8
2005 SDG 16 323 500 64.6 3576 7.2 24 54 15 89.2

by davver on Jan 21, 2010 7:09 PM EST reply actions  

Problem with thos efull season stats

is that Flacco made those against the terrible teams and floundered in the big games against the better ones.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 21, 2010 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

so people do worse against better teams, shocker

We can go right back to rotating door mediocrity at the position, if above average and improving isn’t good enough for you. Unless you thing the colts are looking to trade manning (lol).

by davver on Jan 21, 2010 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

Bruce don’t jump!!

by BmoreBlitz on Jan 22, 2010 8:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Not saying he isn't the answer, guys!

I want Flacco to be here for the next 12 years or more. I just need to see ANY progression against the better teams. ANY!?

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 22, 2010 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Rice passes and Rice YAC yards do wonders for Flacco’s stats.

by raven on Jan 22, 2010 11:24 AM EST up reply actions  

You forgot Ben Roethlisberger in there...

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 22, 2010 8:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, yes I did

but every time I tried to type his name, my hand shook too much to admit it!

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 22, 2010 9:19 AM EST up reply actions  

It may not solve all the problems, but we need a good wide reciever

I prefer to get one through the draft, but won’t be upset if they prefer a vet.

That said, we simply need one reciever for Flacco to get used to. Mason is a great reciever, but defenses aren’t scared of someone whos well over 30 and close to retiring. In order for him to to progress, we need a deep reciever, one that can make difficult catches on some of Flacco’s poor throws.

Flacco is on track to be a great QB for his era, but these years are quite valuable to his growth, and it could severely impact his potential if he doesn’t have a big play WR to grow with.

"We're only going to score 17 points?"

by Edgware on Jan 21, 2010 7:35 PM EST reply actions  

Get a Fast One

If the Ravens are going to get a WR then they should get a fast one. Remember the Superbowl year when we had Quadry Ismael. It opened it up for the rushing attack as well.
We need a speedy deep threat to take pressure off of Rice.

Don't forget to check out my blog at Baltimore Ravens Chat

Best regards,

Chris

by RavensBlogger on Jan 21, 2010 8:08 PM EST reply actions  

We wil figure out which one that is come combine day.

Preferably over a 4.3 40-yard dash over 6’2 and a minimum of a 40 inch vertical. I’m practically drooling at this make-up.

by Zachary Beard on Jan 21, 2010 8:16 PM EST up reply actions  

We will get the next

Darius Heyward-Bey! Oh boy!

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 21, 2010 8:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Floyd?(tall receiver out of ND), is he coming out

That guy can high point, run , and catch. I know he had Golden Tate(the next steve smith from carolina) on the other side but this can play! If he’s coming out draft his arse!

by BmoreBlitz on Jan 22, 2010 8:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Some team (can't remember)

had a 6’10" WR who was fast and had good hands as well. I think he was a TE and now I believe he was on Navy! Does that mean he is unavailable for 5 years? Kyle Eckels, Saints RB was available right away. Know why? I know the “secret.”

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 22, 2010 9:21 AM EST up reply actions  

stats don't tell the whole story

I am not going to say get rid of Flacco. He is better than most of the QBs the Ravens have ever had, I hope he develops into an all-time great. I will say that those second year stats everyone loves to point at don’t tell the whole story. It reminds me so much of the Bert Jones situation in the 70’s. Everyone said “Look at all those completions!”, but I kept thinking then, as I do now, that a HUGE chunk of those completions were 1 yard passes to Lydell Mitchell where Mitchell made the extra yards on his own. It is great having a go to halfback who can catch the ball – I love that but many of those great stats of Joe’s can rest firmly on Ray Rice’s shoulders. 58 more receptions for Joe than last year – I know where they went. Still Joe had to get them to him so he gets credit for that. I think I am more upset at the 7 losses and in ANY of those a sharper QB who is a leader could have won them. Stats don’t always show interceptions in the red zone when we needed points desperately. He needs to be a leader. This is the Ravens – show some passion! I don’t want to hear next season “Well he’s only in his third year…” Lead the team Joe!

by Rayfan1 on Jan 22, 2010 9:34 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Totally agree

A long time ago, I heard the typical growth spurt in QB’s come in their 3rd thru 5th years. If we don’t see a huge growth in Flacco in the next couple of years, then while he may set all the Ravens QB records and be3 a solid QB for many years, he won’t ever be THAT guy we were all hoping for when he was taken in the first round tow years ago. Cross your fingers.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 22, 2010 10:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Right on man. Right on.

(said the hippy to Forrest Gump at the podium on the Washington D.C. Mall)

by raven on Jan 22, 2010 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Joe's a leader,

He’s always the first one in the castle and last one out. You can tell all he wants to do is win. He’s still going to be himself though, not the rah rah crazy Philip Rivers type. Eli Manning won a SB with even less emotion showing (he did need a great WR to help him though).

by BmoreBlitz on Jan 22, 2010 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Wayne, Harrison, Sanders and the golden grill had a little to do with Mannings success.

who wants joe to be a rah rah guy. just don’t get put on your head every 3rd and 4+.

by raven on Jan 22, 2010 1:28 PM EST reply actions  

I say we sign Moss and TO and draft Bryant in the first round. Fixed.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jan 22, 2010 2:52 PM EST reply actions  

Nah, do this:

Wait til Favre retires again and then lure him out of retirement (that should be hard!) to give us one season to go to the Super Bowl and have Joe finally have someone to learn from before taking back over as a better player then.

aka 'Rexx'

by Bruce Raffel on Jan 23, 2010 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

ya right...

that would be a long shot, hell prolly be in crutches by then.

by Ravens4Life on Jan 23, 2010 5:33 PM EST up reply actions  

We need to work out a deal with Indy to send our receivers to Manning for a year so we can guage if they suck or not and end this Flacco or receiver situation.

by raven on Jan 23, 2010 7:59 PM EST reply actions  

Can't really disagree....BUT

at this point what do we have to lose? We’ve tried our homegrown receivers to no avail. It’s been incredibly frustrating and both the QB and WRs shoulder the blame. I still think we need a proven commodity and a draft steal to make it happen on offense. If we get a good to great free agent and draft a high second round rated WR I’d be happen. We should take the CB from Florida State to satifsy that need and then hit the WR need then everywhere else….TE comes to mind as well. But I think at this point going in a different direction with the WR corps is logical. We’ve done all we can with what we have. No more talk of potential.

by Dfense4champs2052 on Jan 26, 2010 8:50 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Baltimore Ravens.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Unitas_-_brooks_final_game_memorial_stadium_small
A Look at the Ravens 2012 Salary Cap
Reed_small
Just a Game?
Chrisrock_small
The Irony

Recent FanPosts

Small
Ravens' Offseason Predictions
Baltimore_ravens_alt_small
Super Bowl...
Unitas_-_brooks_final_game_memorial_stadium_small
Dear Ursula
Small
Offseason Predictions..
Small
Sexy Super Bowl
739c5943_small
Coaches That Should Be On The Ravens Radar
P1030707_small
Assessing Vontaze Burfict
Ray_small
Lardarius Webb
Small
What losing Pagano means

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Manager

Br-ravens2_small Bruce Raffel

Editor

Edreed4_small Zachary Beard

Author

Joestache_small Mr MaLoR

30_frankensuggs_news_small lastcallbmore

Reed_small WestminsterRaven