Ravens Passing Attack Will Improve In 2009
This story, along with the same headline, could have been written the day the 2008 season ended with the loss in the AFC Championship Game in Pittsburgh to the Steelers. Obviously, a full year of experience under the belt of a rookie QB plus the chance to have the entire off season to prepare to be the starter in 2009 is a major benefit to Joe Flacco.
Then came the NFL Draft and while many fans were clamoring about which wide receiver the Ravens were going to select with their 26th pick in the first round, GM Ozzie Newsome pulled a fast one by moving up and grabbing offensive tackle Michael Oher (Mississippi). In fact, the Ravens did not select a wide receiver in the entire draft, which astounded and even angered many Ravens fans, much less the vicious local and national media. Obviously, Ozzie thought that the players in the draft didn't warrant first round selection as much as a great steal for help on the offensive line did. The other rounds didn't offer much to him either, as he stocked up on depth all around the field on both sides of the ball. Shortly after the draft, veteran right tackle Willie Anderson decided to hang up his cleats and retire, thrusting the rookie Oher into aa starting role, making Ozzie look that much more like the "Wizard" he earned his nickname from, picking winners out of the draft. A full year of experience for the rest of the line plus the addition of veteran All Pro center Matt Birk highlighted the off season, all combined to equal a great recipe for 2009 success in the passing game.
Then came the terrible murder of former Ravens QB Steve McNair, followed shortly thereafter by the unexpected announcement from WR Derrick Mason that he was retiring after 12 NFL seasons.
Ravens fans, once again along with the local and national media, went ballistic. A receiving corps that was already thin and criticized as being non-offensive, had just been decimated by the loss of it's top receiver and some say it's only true threat. It was bad enough to have people saying how we would now be a losing team and the second year QB would have no one to throw to. Luckily the team held two different tryouts in the off season, netting two more wideouts to add to the mix in the event that Mason does decide to officially retire, which many are beginning to think that he will hopefully return for 2009. The two tryouts brought two veteran receivers to the team with a combined total of four receptions in 2008. To many, these were moves of desperation, and these guys were either washed up or not what they were looking for, when there were star players like the Arizona Cardinals' Anquan Boldin and Denver Broncos' Brandon Marshall apparently out there on the trading block. However, Ozzie relishes his team's #1 draft picks like the gold they are and will not relinquish them for anyone, much less two disgruntled players who would be demanding huge contracts to keep them happy as he was looking at the team's own players who would need to be rewarded with big contracts in the next year or so. The choice of retaining a Terrell Suggs, Haloti Ngata, Jared Gaither and/or Ben Grubbs versus bringing on an outisde WR with no promises was an easy one for Ozzie to make and I totally support that decision.
So how will the Ravens passing game actually be even better in 2009 than it was in 2008? That's relatively easy when it was rated 28th last season, averaging just over 175 yards/game. With or without Derrick Mason, the team is a year more experienced at the key positions needed to improve, mainly QB and offensive line. The wide receivers are as good or I dare say without Mason, even better? Yes, I said even better. I realize that Mason caught a ton of passes last year as Flacco's main target, but he was Joe's first option. If Mark Clayton moves over to assume that role, his stats will be very similar to Mason's, just you watch. Newcomer Drew Bennett gives Flacco a huge target and runs crisp routes with great hands, so the lack of speed should not make a difference with him. The progress that Demetrius Williams and Marcus Smith have both made in the off season will only give them and Joe more confidence whenever they do get the chance to be on the field. Plus, the additon of tight end L.J. Smith along with a healthy Todd Heap should greatly improve the number and variety of options in our passing game. Lastly, the emergence of second year running back Ray Rice should add a new wrinkle in the passing attack, now having a receiving threat out of the backfield for the first time in a long time!
All in all, I am confident that you will see this team improve its ranking in the passing game in 2009. Understanding that we will still be a run-first offense, this team should be in the top 20 or even top 15 by year's end in passing statistics. Flacco's arm is just too good for Offensvie Coordinator Cam Cameron to not take full advantage of after keeping him in his reins thier first season together. As Joe said in his Fantasy Files video, "Last year was just the beginning."
0 recs |
36 comments
|
Comments
I couldn't agree more
I also would have to throw at least one more name in the mix, I really think if he gets the chance Washington could be a factor, he has good size, better than average speed and for the first time in the NFL doesn’t have names like Moss or Loco Cinco/ sorry I couldn’t help myself… There are a few other no names that if they learn from those above them also have good speed and size. Lets also not for get about Troy Smith, I think he likes being a Raven and will find his spot to stay…
by Asmodeus1971 on Jul 25, 2009 12:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The problem w/ Kelly Washington
is that with the addition of Drew Bennett, and even w/o Mason, Washington is fighting for playing time w/ M. Smith and D. Will, behind both Bennett and Clayton. If D-Mase does return, then he is further down on the depth chart and must rely on his Special Teams skills to even make the opening day roster.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jul 25, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Was Bennett named the starter?
Or am I missing something?
by DT711 on Jul 26, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It will all depend on Mason's status
I’m sure he will run with the second team right out of the gate, with both Clayton and Marcus Smith getting first team nod (DWill is still limping a bit). If D-Mase returns, then it’s just like last year.
However, if Mason’s gone, then I fully expect the coaches to go with Clayton and Bennett to start the regular season, as experience will win out over youth. D-Will and Smith will have their shots if Mason is done, but it will be harder for them to get their chances if Mason returns.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jul 26, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
Bruce, you don’t think too highly of Mason. I feel like he was our steadfast #1 last year, and he performed extremely well. I can’t imagine those last few games without him. And I’d have to think he still would be #1.
by Ravens Boner on Jul 25, 2009 9:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I love and respect Mason
but think that Clayton, who I really like, is a lot like a younger version of Derrick aqnd could do as well based on his younger age and similar style. Just saying that as Flacco’s first read, he should put up similar numbers. If Mason does returnb, Clayton should stick at #2 and put up much better stats than last year, mostly based on Flacco’s progress.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jul 25, 2009 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
IF Mason does return
A healthy Mason, Clayton, Bennett is a pretty damn good group.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Jul 26, 2009 2:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
While I'm not concerned about the receiving corps,...
….with or w/o Mason and even Bennett, I just can’t label the group, “pretty damn good.”
To me as I’ve said in the past, they don’t have to be “good,” just “good enough.”
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Jul 26, 2009 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t think of a worse group in football.
www.lowbrowsophisticate.com
by kwoog on Jul 26, 2009 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Edwards, Cribbs and Masuqui
Robiskie is the only good one and he will realize the shitty franchise and city he is playing for, even if he is from Ohio.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Jul 26, 2009 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s ridiculous and you know it. Edwards is a former Pro Bowler who still put up 873 yards despite playing 1/3 of his schedule w/out an NFL caliber QB (ie, 4th stringer). He alone makes this unit superior to the Ravens, even if Mason comes back.
www.lowbrowsophisticate.com
by kwoog on Jul 27, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What 4th string QB you talkin about?
Dorsey or Derrick “I got cut from the Practice Squad” Anderson?
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Jul 27, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You may have the edge on WR
But the Ravens have the edge in every other position, and you know that.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Jul 27, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
i’d trade our WRs for the Browns’ WRs any day. But there isn’t a single other position I’d say that about. Their OL is good but I’m still happy with ours.
by jackmca on Jul 27, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’d argue our Oline is better, but you’re right that that might be the only other position. I’d include QB, b/c I think Quinn will have a better career than Flacco, but obviously that’s not based on stats.
www.lowbrowsophisticate.com
by kwoog on Jul 27, 2009 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
…but obviously that’s not based on stats.
…or logic, or empirical evidence. It must be hard to make that assertion with a straight face when Quinn barely knows what an NFL win feels like and Flacco has no idea what it’s like to end a season short of the playoffs.
Water covers 2/3 of the Earth's surface. Ed Reed covers the rest.
by Ampallang on Jul 27, 2009 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm a die-hard Irish fan
so I know my stuff about Quinn. He could pan out as a pro, or not, but his physical gifts are maybe half of what Flacco is working with. Flacco can throw deep without even setting his feet, he’s taller, more accurate, and has a higher release point on the ball.
Quinn is a great athlete who has his head in the game. I think he can be good, very good even. But Flacco has the better upside. I think if you asked fans of the other 30 teams (non Ravens and non Browns fans) they would mostly agree with that.
by jackmca on Jul 27, 2009 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pedigree and college stats. Studies have shown that QBs who start that many games and have that amount of success (completion %, TD/INT ratio, play at a big program) have a very high rate of success in the NFL. I consider Flacco’s season to be as valid as Anderson’s 07, with the obvious difference being a couple Ws in the post season (though I’d hardly hang my hat on game ratings of 59, 89 and 18).
Quinn has had one start in the NFL where he was 100%. There is no doubt in my mind that the Ravens would have had similar success last year w/ him at the helm.
www.lowbrowsophisticate.com
by kwoog on Jul 27, 2009 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no doubt in your mind? i have a few in mine.
Again, as an Irish fan, there’s nothing you can tell me about Quinn. I know him upside down. Flacco has 2x the arm Quinn has. A lot of those wins were due to that arm specifically.
You said it yourself, Quinn has one start in the NFL where he was 100%. So, if you have “no doubt” that a team can go 11-5 with a QB who only has one good start under his belt, then I’m just glad you’re not running my team. It’s possible, but not likely.
by jackmca on Jul 28, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
HAHAHAHHA. Quote of the year
b/c I think Quinn will have a better career than Flacco
Until he wins a playoff, he is no where near Joe.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Jul 27, 2009 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
I know my snarky “losing Ohio Teams”comment was stated with tongue firmly implanted in cheek, but you are serious about Quinn over Superbrow…
Until Quinn The Eskimo wins a few more games and leads his team to the playoffs, there is no argument… Gold star to first who recognizes the eskimo reference…
by vlad755 on Jul 31, 2009 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The same could be said for the Browns entire team.
I can’t think of a worse group in football.
by DT711 on Jul 27, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure it could be said. It couldn’t be taken seriously, but it could be said.
www.lowbrowsophisticate.com
by kwoog on Jul 27, 2009 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
kinda like all that stuff you keep saying?
by jackmca on Jul 27, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Poor Kwoog……
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Jul 27, 2009 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Joe Thomas, Shaun Rogers, Braylon Edwards, Eric Steinbach and Eric Wright alone make the Browns better than 3 other teams in the NFL. That’s why calling us the worst team in football can’t be taken seriously. Name a worse receiving corps in the league (sigh), other than the Browns.
www.lowbrowsophisticate.com
by kwoog on Jul 27, 2009 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sure, the Browns aren't the WORST
but they’re only barely above that category. I think, if this were a Bill Simmons power poll, the Browns would fall into his “Bruce Coslet Division.” Actually, as of week 16, that’s exactly where he had you. No. 29 overall. I’d agree with that.
by jackmca on Jul 28, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha here's Simmons' money quote:
“Romeo Crennel is getting fired after the season. Like, right after it ends. Quite possibly as he’s walking off the field in Week 17. They might not even let him get into the locker room; they might just have his stuff waiting outside in a box.”
—Bill Simmons, week 16, 2008
by jackmca on Jul 28, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yep..but the Browns will let us air it out in the 2nd half for 2 more wins.
by raven on Jul 26, 2009 7:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
So much for this story.....
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Jul 27, 2009 8:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ravens Receivers = Achilles Heel
Without Mason, im putting 8 in the box against Baltimore and daring Flacco to put it up. I’m totally shutting down their running game and forcing them to beat me through the air. Since most secondaries will be better than their receiving corps, Flacco is going to end up with more interceptions than touchdowns.
If Mason really does retire and they dont cut loose with some draft picks to get Boldin or Marshall, their looking at a 6-10 season.
by Darren C on Jul 27, 2009 10:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i'll take any bet with you that Flacco has more TDs than INTs when the year ends.
plus, Mason is coming back.
Stop jumping on this “Ravens WRs are awful” bandwagon, everyone is just spewing cliches and nobody really knows what our WRs actually look like (including us). Teams have won with bad WRs before, it can be done. I’d love it if Flacco had to face 8 in the box, just about any NFL receiving corps could handle that. (That’s why there’s almost never 8 in the box.)
by jackmca on Jul 28, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i won’t argue that prediction. flacco needs mason. even with one arm mason was flaccos number one. a guy with 1 arm. now that’s gone.
any hope clayton had of busting out was swalloped up at the fact he will now garner the number 1 DB. he’s not good enough to break that on a regular basis.
ray rice’s roll in the passing game just jumped through the roof.
this team reminds me of the Phil Simms Giants. Defense. Defense. Defense. Veteran LB play. Big DE. Strong run game. Non-rememberable receivers (McKonky) and a little guy named Morris (Ray Rice) taking them to the SB. better to have a run game than pass game. dan marino whatched a lot of Phil Simms games from his couch.
by raven on Jul 28, 2009 12:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs












