True Two Clayton?
Mark Clayton has been in the shadows of Derrick Mason, coaching changes, a quarterback carousel and lower offensive expectations over the past three years. Drafted 22nd in 2005, Clayton was not picked to complement a struggling offense but to be a building block for future success.
After being disappointed by Travis Taylor and a long, long list of fillers, Ravens fans and coaches hoped Clayton would balance the field. He had to be more than a roll player and by taking him high in the draft it’s obvious the Raven community expects huge things from him. He hasn’t totally disappointed but he leaves much to be desired from a team that desperately needs their number 2 receiver to compete with the other notable tandems in the league and provide a spark in the playoffs. This team needs a competitor other than Mason to keep teams honest. Mason, with one good arm, continued to be option #1 and the only real passing threat last season. Doubled over in pain, he had more receptions and impact catches than Clayton. It will be a struggle to repeat last year’s success with similar hopes.
Clayton’s number of catches from 4 different quarterbacks has dropped over the past 3 regular seasons. He had 67 in 2006, 48 in 2007 and just 41 in 2008. In regular season games, including his rookie 2005 year, Clayton has 200 catches for 2636 yards and 118 first downs. That’s an average of 42.5 yards and 1.9 first downs a game. Being a smaller receiver with speed as an asset, he averages 4.7 in YAC. He has played in all but 2 regular season games in 4 years. There is no doubt that he is a strong athlete and team player but these yards and first down numbers could probably be reached passing to a RB let alone a #2 receiver. I’d have faith in Ray Rice reaching these numbers catching passes at the line of scrimmage.
His catches for first downs have dropped over the past three years from 42 to 30 to 23. With Heap being injured, having no true backup TE, spotty #3 receivers, an injured Mason, and new faces in the backfield during these past few years, I would have expected Clayton’s opportunities for first down catches to have increased substantially. There is no outstanding reason to point fingers at Mark but the spotlight illuminates him this year as our quarterback, backfield and o-line is now stronger. Just as one armed Mason, Suggs, Ngata, Ray and an injured Reed dared teams to come at them in ‘08, I welcome a #2 receiver who wants the damn ball. I think Mark can do it and he showed more flashes last year than previous years that he is capable of the big play. The below stats show that he is only a percentage or two away from other #2 receivers as far as catching his % of passes. Maybe he just needs a hot spotlight and a little fan rumbling to take him to the next level.
Regular Season:
2006 Ravens rush 476, pass att.524, 1017 total plays, 282 1st downs, 96 of 233 on 3rd
2006 Clayton caught 67 or 12.8% of passes attempted
2007 Ravens rush 446, pass att.557, 1042 total plays, 291 1st downs, 90 of 234 on 3rd
2007 Clayton caught 48 or 8.6% of passes attempted
2008 Ravens rush 592, pass att.433, 1058 total plays, 300 1st downs, 95 of 232 on 3rd
2008 Clayton caught 41 or 9.5% of passes attempted
Catch % of passes in 2008 Regular Season:
TJ 17.9%, Chad 10.3%, and Reggie Kelly 6% Cincy Passes Attempted
Ward 14.5%, Holmes 11%, Miller 9.5%, Washington 8%, Moore 8% Pitt. PA.
Edwards 11.3%, Winslow 8.8%, Heiden 4.7% o Cleveland PA.
Mason 18.5%, Clayton 9.5%, Heap 8%. Balt. PA
(Stats compiled though data from NFL.com)
You have to like how Pitt. distributes the ball
The opinions posted here are those of the administrator of this blog and his loyal readers. They are in no way official comments from the team, and should not be misconstued as such, even though he thinks he could do just as well or even a better job!
0 recs |
15 comments
Comments
I notice how Pitt. traded in 4% or so of Ward’s passes to ditribute to the 4th and 5th option. They spread it around a little more equally and didn’t keep pounding Ward like we had to/want to with Mason and Cincy does with TJ. I think Ward could easily demand more balls but his blocks and team play obviously work for them.
I also notice how by decreasing our passes by 124 and increasing our runs by 146 from ‘07 to ’08 we gained 16 additional plays and 9 first downs. That imbalance gave us an average of 1 more play a game. Is that worth being overly predictable and heavy on the run. We don’t waiver much from our number of 3rd downs. Thats pretty incredible how fine a line football numbers can be.
by raven on May 28, 2009 4:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mark Clayton has been in the shadows of Anthony Mason
The basketball player?
Seriously though, I see the Ravens getting the ball to multiple guys this year, as Pitt did in 2008. I think Mason, Clayton, Heap, L.J Smith, D-Will (If healthy), Marcus Smith and Kelly Washington could all make an impact. We may not have that one big play guy but hopefully the sum of all parts will get it done.
raven, I do agree that Clayton needs to show something more this year to not be considered a disappointment. I think he is going to turn some heads. He finally has the talent and continuity at the QB position where there will be no one else to blame if he doesn’t improve. Mason didn’t really break out until his fourth or fifth season in TEN (granted he was used as a return guy then) and we know how he turned out. Here’s to wishing Clayton’s career follows a similar trajectory.
by DT711 on May 28, 2009 4:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah…i need to take it easy on the guy. he did some great things this year when we were dead in the water. he made some nice grabs though far and few between. i need to get him some Gary Clark footage.
by raven on May 28, 2009 5:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I was watching an interview of John Harbaugh this morning. In the interview, Harbaugh said that Cameron was limiting the offense and Flacco to “safe” throws last season. In many words, Harbaugh said that Flacco can safely make more throws than the average quarterback because of his arm strength. Because of that, the offense was able to rely on him, but he was still a rookie. Harbaugh was careful to say that Cameron would open the playbook even more this next season.
That being said, it’s easy to see why our receivers struggled. It’s hard for receivers on wide-open, passing offenses to consistently beat coverage and make plays. It’s MUCH harder on an offense that’s being limited. I still think that Flacco was pretty amazing for a rookie, but it’s good to know that he will only get better. As he improves, our receivers will improve. I think that we have a good receivers and that they will surprise people next season. Do we have the next Larry Fitzgerald? Probably not, but the Patriots went to the Super Bowl with Deon Branch (SB MVP). With our ball-control offense, I don’t believe that we need that type of receiver… although I’d love to see it.
by BAL_Hawk on May 28, 2009 7:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I culd easily see
Mason moving on in a year (or two). Clayton could have a very decent year in ’09, then assume the “Mason” role for the next four or five years. He is sort of the same type of receiver that Derrick was when he was younger. He could turn into an excellent possession receiver, with people like D-Will, Marcus Smith, K-Wash and who knows as the over the middle and field stretching guys.
Bruce Raffel
by Bruce Raffel on May 28, 2009 7:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I secretly have very high hopes for Marcus Smith.
by BAL_Hawk on May 28, 2009 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is that kind of like how Mr MaLoR keeps a Troy Smith poster on the ceiling over his bed?
Water covers 2/3 of the Earth's surface. Ed Reed covers the rest.
by Ampallang on May 29, 2009 1:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Changed it to Matt Katula
The long snapper.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on May 29, 2009 1:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I openly have high hopes for Marcus Smith.
Bruce Raffel
by Bruce Raffel on May 29, 2009 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice
breakdown of the statistics. Agree 100% with following the Pitt model of spreading the throws around.
Clayton’s drop off in productivity can be attributed to a number of various reasons, but recent reports are stating that he is developing better chemistry with Flacco and “stepping up” in the OTA’s. Along with the flashes we saw last year, a good sign the trend will reverse.
I think the main thing to keep in consideration regarding Clayton is the fact that he has not had a chance to develop in a balanced offense . That opportunity should present itself this season.
by adh on May 28, 2009 9:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think this sums up our argument perfectly.
He hasn’t totally disappointed but he leaves much to be desired from a team that desperately needs their number 2 receiver to compete with the other notable tandems in the league and provide a spark in the playoffs.
People should know we are not in anyway disrespecting what Clayton has done, but we are vouching for more looks. He does indeed make things happen when it is thrown to his side. Very rarely are we complaining that he drops the ball (I cannot recall a moment where I said “come one Clayton!”).
He has shown that he can make it happen when given the opportunity. We just do not see if as often as it really should be.
As mediocre as our WR group may be compared to the other groups in the league, a year under this system should indeed help.
Cause as of right now, it looks like we are sticking with the guys we have now.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on May 28, 2009 10:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Cause as of right now, it looks like we are sticking with the guys we have now.
Which is not a bad thing. That’s what most of us are arguing. Let me put it into terms that we (Ravens fans) can understand… How many teams in the league would love to have linebackers like ours? Many teams covet our linebackers. That’s why we see other teams overpaying for Bart Scott and Adalius Thomas, but we know what happens. They go to another team and are not as successful. It’s because of the system! The Ravens make average defensive players look outstanding (Jim Leonard).
The same can be said of offensive systems. We would love to have Reggie Wayne or Anquan Boldin, but just remember that those guys are also products of their system. Our system doesn’t spotlight receivers anymore than the Colts system spotlights linebackers. Of course, the Ravens and the Colts draft differently. The teams draft according to their scheme. Since teams can never have superstars at every position, the best teams develop a system where their average players can play outside themselves. That’s why the Ravens have a great defense and the Colts have a great offense. That’s also why the Colts rarely have a busted offense draft pick and the Ravens rarely have a busted defensive draft pick. It’s the system, and it’s the heart and soul of the modern NFL. The Ravens will improve within their system, but they will probably never have a pass first offense.
by BAL_Hawk on May 28, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
PROMOTED!!
raven, update “Date” and repost so it has today’s date. Great topic and stats to back it up. Thanks!
Bruce Raffel
by Bruce Raffel on May 29, 2009 8:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
mason had double the catch % over clayton. pitt and cleveland (young qbs) had just a few % points difference between their 1st and 2nd receiver. i know that flacco was being treated with kid gloves but to have clayton take such a back seat is questionable. i’m not asking for joe to throw deep to clayton every play. clayton could have lined up opposite mason and run similar safe short routes. having those two receivers darting around within 10 yards like Indy and Pitt like to do would have at least made D’s guess a little. Pitt runs a safe O with Ben as they try to keep him under control. they just seem to have multiple short pass options as their stats show. it’s not like we’re asking THAT much of Flacco. i think it would have helped him more than just staring down curls in the flats. those were the obvious “safe” passes that ate him up against Tenn and Pitt..
by raven on May 29, 2009 2:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs









