2009 NFL Mock Draft
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 18, 2009 1:09 PM EDT
69 comments
Updated March 18, 2009.
The draft is always an exciting time for NFL fans. Every team, no matter how good or bad they did last season, is looking to improve. There is a lot of strategy to the draft, and over the years, the Ravens have proven that they are one of the best scouting teams in the league. The following is my list of players that I think the Ravens will target and the likelihood of them being available.
- WR Michael Crabtree (very unlikely)
- LB Aaron Curry (very unlikely)
- WR Jeremy Maclin (unlikely)
- LB Rey Maualuga (unlikely)
- CB Vontae Davis (unlikely)
- WR Darius Heyward-Bey (unlikely)
- CB Malcolm Jenkins (unlikely)
- WR Hakeem Nicks (probable)
- TE Brandon Pettigrew (probable)
- CB Darius Butler (probable)
- CB Alphonso Smith (probable)
- WR Kenny Britt (probable)
If any of the big-name tackles (Eugene Monroe, Michael Oher, Jason Smith or Andre Smith) fall to twenty-six, the Ravens should take them, but I seriously doubt that will happen. I wrote analysis for my top-ten picks and Baltimore's pick. I also include video links for most players. I have done research on every team, but I’m a fan of the Ravens. Please feel free to give me your opinions. If you would like to see more mock drafts, check out SBNation's Mocking the Draft.
Don’t forget to check out my video FanShot. It gives a short history of the Ravens franchise and their legacy of strong drafting.
1. Detroit Lions
QB Matthew Stafford, Georgia
Stafford has the arm that the Lions are looking for. The new regime has done nothing to improve the quarterback position in free agency. This tells me that they will draft a quarterback. They could draft an offensive tackle first and then try to get a quarterback second. However, there aren’t any safe bets in the draft this year, and Stafford is the best option. If they don’t take him, I think that it would be a huge mistake.
2. St. Louis Rams
OT Jason Smith, Baylor
With Orlando Pace gone, the Rams need a new franchise left tackle. In fact, they needed one while he was still there. Smith had a meteoric rise during the scouting combine, and I don’t think that it’s a coincidence that St. Louis released Pace only days after the combine. I’m pretty sure that the Rams will draft a tackle, and I’m guessing it will be Smith. He has more upside than any other tackle prospect.
3. Kansas City Chiefs
The Chiefs are thrilled to get Curry and they should be. In my opinion, he is the most talented prospect in this year’s draft. It’s even better now that they have Vrabel to teach Curry how to play linebacker in the NFL. This is a solid pick. If Curry is on the board, the Chiefs will draft him.
4. Seattle Seahawks
Seattle’s pick was hard to figure out. I wanted to rule out Crabtree since they signed Houshmandzadeh, but I think that Crabtree is still a possibility. It’s an outside chance, but it is possible. When it comes down to it, the Seahawks will probably draft a tackle. It’s hard and rare to find elite talent on the offensive line. They should take advantage of the opportunity, but don’t expect them to pass on Crabtree lightly.
5. Cleveland Browns
I have a feeling that the Browns are going to do something stupid with this pick. I don’t know why. That’s why I almost had them taking Malcolm Jenkins here. They should take Orakpo. Even an idiot can see that he’s the best pass rusher available, and that’s where they need help. On the other hand, I wouldn’t rule out Crabtree or Raji. I think that Crabtree is a better prospect, but everyone in Cleveland knows that they need defensive help. Raji would help. However, they already have Rogers, and they think that he’s good for some reason. Anyway, Orakpo makes the most sense here.
6. Cincinnati Bengals
I originally had Crabtree going to the Bengals. It’s still possible. However, I remember last year’s draft. The Bengals wanted Sedrick Ellis badly. Obviously, that didn’t work out, and they need defensive line help more than ever. It will be hard to pass on Crabtree, but in the end, the Bengals need to take the player that will help them the most.
7. Oakland Raiders
WR Michael Crabtree, Texas Tech
Al Davis may be forced to make a solid draft pick. If Crabtree is gone, they probably would take Maclin, which would be a huge reach. Oakland fans are hoping that this scenario pans out, and in all honesty, it’s looking very likely. If Crabtree is available, I’m sure that old Al will draft him. He loves flashy, athletic playmakers. Crabtree fits the bill.
8. Jacksonville Jaguars*
Jacksonville wants to see Raji fall to this spot. However, they need help along the defensive and offensive line. Since Raji is gone, the Jaguars take the next best offensive lineman in the draft. Oher is a solid football player and in my opinion, only a notch below Monroe. Jacksonville could also use a wide receiver, but I think that Maclin is a reach here. If Crabtree fell to them by some madness, expect them to draft him immediately.
9. Green Bay Packers
DE Everette Brown, Florida State
Green Bay has a new defensive coordinator this season, and they need players to fit into their new 34 scheme. Brown is one of the fastest risers in the draft. Some people believe that he’s the best pass rusher in the nation. He’s a fantastic athlete and will be an excellent outside linebacker in a 34 scheme. It’s a good fit for the Packers and fills one of their biggest needs.
10. San Francisco Forty-Niners
I think that Sanchez is the smartest pick for the Niners, and as of right now, I think that they will take him. He may not be a great starter right away, but he will definitely be better than any quarterback that they currently have. Now that Singletary has the job, he needs to start thinking about the future.
11. Buffalo Bills
LB Aaron Maybin, Penn State
12. Denver Broncos
13. Washington Redskins
14. New Orleans Saints*
15. Houston Texans
CB Malcolm Jenkins, Ohio State
16. San Diego Chargers*
17. New York Jets
18. Chicago Bears
WR Darius Heyward-Bey, Maryland
19. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
20. Detroit Lions*
OT Eben Britton, Arizona
21. Philadelphia Eagles
TE Brandon Pettigrew, Oklahoma State
22. Minnesota Vikings
CB Alphonso Smith, Wake Forest
23. New England Patriots
DE Larry English, Northern Illinois
24. Atlanta Falcons
25. Miami Dolphins
26. Baltimore Ravens
WR Hakeem Nicks, North Carolina
Even though I wanted Heyward-Bey fall to the Ravens, I could not betray my objectivity. I just don’t see Darius being available here. If he is available, the Ravens would definitely draft him over Nicks. Cameron likes fast receivers.
Instead, the Ravens take one of my favorite players in the draft. He’s tough like Boldin and reliable like Irvin. He has the best hands in the draft. There are questions about his deep-speed and level of competition. However, there were questions about Flacco’s footwork and level of competition last year. That didn’t seem to bother Ozzie then. This is a classic Raven pick. It’s not sexy, but it’s solid and underrated.
27. Indianapolis Colts
28. Philadelphia Eagles
29. New York Giants
30. Tennessee Titans
31. Arizona Cardinals
32. Pittsburgh Steelers*
*Indicates picks that (I believe) are very tradable.
The opinions posted here are those of the administrator of this blog and his loyal readers. They are in no way official comments from the team, and should not be misconstued as such, even though he thinks he could do just as well or even a better job!
0 recs |
69 comments
|
Email
Print
Comments
If Pettigrew fell to us at 26
I dont think there is a chance in hell we DONT take him. I am beginning to like Pettigrew with the more videos I watch on him. He reminds me of a taller and faster Jason Witten. Does not necessarily run around the defenders, just lowers the shoulder and uses his 6’6", 240 pound frame to just bull you over.
We have very identical drafts here, sure you didnt just copy the beauty of mine????
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 11, 2009 2:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think that they'd take Nicks...
…over Pettigrew, but it would be very close. Pettigrew is awesome, but he may slide due to his slower forty time. It’s hard to justify taking tight-ends early, and Baltimore really needs a wide-receiver.
I actually haven’t read through your mock thoroughly. I wouldn’t be surprised if they are very similar.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 11, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree w/ the Pettigrew comment, because
there is a deep WR class and we can either wait for our second pick or even trade up to grab a decent one, such as Robiskie. However, there’s only one Pettigrew in the draft.
My biggest issue is the number one overall pick. I just don’t see Detroit going QB in the first round. They will take either OT or LB (Curry) with #1. Book it!
Rexx
by Rexx on Mar 12, 2009 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought so too.
Until I saw Jim Schwartz taking about what Matt Stafford brings to a football team. Not only that… Detroit has done NOTHING to solidify their QB position… yet.
As far as Pettigrew is concerned (and that seems to be the biggest contention with my mock draft), I just don’t see him being taken over the top 4-5 receivers. Maybe I’m crazy. If it makes you feel any better, I almost had Atlanta drafting him before us.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 12, 2009 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pettigrew would be a perfect fit
for Atlanta, unfortunately.
Rexx
by Rexx on Mar 12, 2009 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
JESUS!
I have watched that Heyward-Bey video maybe 20 times prior to today and just watched it again. I am blown away by some of the things he does. Everyone out there, including some of you guys here, who say DHB’s hands are questionable, watch all 9 minutes of that game and get back to me. He has 2 catches in that video where he is double covered, goes up higher than any of the CB’s can, and makes the catches while falling down. Unreal talet right there.
If DHB is at 26, we better get him. Best open field runner in the draft. Sorry Harvin, Maclin and crabsbush.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 11, 2009 2:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If you love him so much, why don’t you marry him?
Water covers 2/3 of the Earth's surface. Ed Reed covers the rest.
by Ampallang on Mar 11, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta get a RING first
Get it……
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 11, 2009 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seeing those catches against Delaware and Cal
Makes me miss Fall Semester so much and being able to go to those games.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 11, 2009 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
WOW
Ray maualuga will never make it as high as the 19th pick. There’s no way. and ill bet the ravens grab james laurinitas or pettigrew with their first pick. laurinitas is a definate high first round pick, and cant be passed up. but pettigrew? if he makes it to the 26th pick there is no way in hell that the ravens wont grab him. hes just too good to pass up
by Ravens4Life on Mar 11, 2009 4:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Again...
History shows that tight ends are not typically drafted high. Todd Heap was selected 31st overall. Jason Witten was selected in the third round, and Antonio Gates was undrafted. Teams usually have more urgent needs to fill in the first round. I like Pettigrew, but I just don’t see that Ravens drafting him if Nicks is on the board. They’d probably take Pettigrew over Britt but not over Nicks. By the way, I almost had Atlanta taking Laurinaitis, but I changed it to Maybin. If Laurinaitis gets past Atlanta, I think he will fall out of round one.
Also, why don’t you think Maualuga will be taken at nineteen? I was thinking Tampa, San Diego, Detriot and New England were options for him. I went with Tampa because they just released Brooks.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 11, 2009 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
about maualuga...
i dont really have an intelligent answer for why i said that. but i just cannot see him making it past pick 15 maybe. hes just too good a linebacker, comparible to ray lewis in the day even. i bet we even see teams trading up to try and grab him maybe. but if he does make it that high then ill say your a smart man.
and atlanta just signed peterson from the jags. hes old but efficient, so i think theyll take someone else first round. but i almost guarantee laurinitas makes it to the 26th pick and ozzie will consider getting him. and also, i just dont see heyward bey going that high. in front of maualuga even. hell be a 23 to 28 pick.
by Ravens4Life on Mar 12, 2009 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That combine 40 will have a lot of scouts and FO guys drooling though
It only takes one.
They ball when they can and I'm ballin' by nature
Addicted to the game like Jordan and Peyton
-Lil Wayne "Fireman"
by shake n bake on Mar 12, 2009 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What he said.
I have a feeling that Heyward-Bey is going to be a hot-item on draft day. Scouts go crazy over big guys that can run fast forties. I actually wouldn’t be surprised if Oakland took him at seven. It would be crazy… but I don’t consider it outsider the realm of possibilities.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 12, 2009 7:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you sure your name isn’t Al Davis. The only team that drafts off of combine numbers are the raiders.
by archon095 on Mar 13, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay...
I read you backwards. When you said “Ray Maualuga will never make it as high as the 19th pick,” I thought you were saying that he wouldn’t be drafted before 19. I agree with you then. I think that he’s one of the draft’s best players, and I only dropped him in my rankings because of his combine performance.
If he does fall, several teams may trade up. Denver may take him at twelve… or San Diego at sixteen. Where do you see him falling?
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 12, 2009 7:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see him falling...
i think the biggest contenders for a middle backer need is jacksonville and denver at the top. the jags just released peterson and denver just needs somebody to make their defense sound better. but i agree with you that the jags go for a tackle first, so i dont see maualuga making it past denver. and i hate saying that because i hate the broncos more than any other team ive ever watched, and i would hate seeing a talent like maualuga having the misfortune of falling to their team. so im hoping somebody, ANYBODY, trades up to grab him before he reaches denvers pick. cuz i think if he makes to pick 12, he will definately become a bronco
by Ravens4Life on Mar 12, 2009 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We drafted Tavares Gooden last year for this exact reason
We got him as a steal in the 3rd round last year. I have heard that he is our best athlete at the Linebacking position. LB is not one of our weakest positions right now. Dont underestimate Gooden just because he was not a first round pick like Ray and Suggs were. We have had PLENTY of success with later round guys in our LB system.
Hartwell, Adalius, Scott, and now it is Gooden’s turn. Plus being from the U, all those guys are freaks when they come in the NFL. Ray Lewis has already accepted T-Good and has been on board to teach the kid everything there is to know about being successful on our team. Ray even DEMANDED that he room with Gooden during Training camp last year. Would not be surprised if he makes sure this happens again. Gooden could be Ray’s replacement once he retires.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 11, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ray demanded to room with Gooden?
I never knew that. That’s actually a good sign and it gives me more confidence in Gooden. I have always liked him. He’s very athletic, but I have always questioned his first-step. He doesn’t seem to have the instincts that alot of the great ones possess. If he spends enough time around Ray, maybe that can be learned. It worked for Scott… and just about every LB that the Ravens have ever started.
I don’t know. My mind isn’t totally made up on Scott’s (and eventually Ray’s) replacement. The Ravens seem to have the same mentality too. I think that they will open it up to competition, and I’m not sure if Ray’s successor is even on the roster yet.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 11, 2009 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
same here
i had no idea about that. but thats a good sign. gooden may be the future sometime. but still, i still sayin ozzie will probably consider laurinitas.
by Ravens4Life on Mar 12, 2009 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Watch the video of Laurinaitis.
He looks undersized and weak in the clips that I have seen of him. If I can see this, scouts can too. Don’t get me wrong. I like the guy and I think he’s a solid football player. If the Ravens drafted him in the second round, I wouldn’t be surprised. In fact, I’d be happy. However, he had a very poor combine effort and that reinforces the concerns about his physical abilities. I just don’t see teams burning a first round pick on him.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 12, 2009 7:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Laurinitis
Will not be our 1st Rd pick. I don’t think he fits in with what Oz looks for at LB, not to mention we have a few backup LB’s already on the roster who may have a higher ceiling then him.
by DT711 on Mar 12, 2009 8:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If clay matthews is there, maybe consider him
That long haired white boy plays with some fire.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 12, 2009 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He is maybe the most overrated player that people think is going in the first round.
I thought he was a monster the year before, but he lost something this year. I would take him if he is there in the 2nd, but not first at all.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 12, 2009 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you know
that everybody thought ray lewis was undersized before we drafted him. look how that turned out
by Ravens4Life on Mar 12, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True.
Watch Ray’s college tape and then watch Jame’s tape. There is no comparison. Ray was all over the field, and he NEVER looked weak.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 12, 2009 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
James is weak
Not polished anymore, dont know what happened. Was amazing 2 years ago but something just does not look right with him. He looks lazy out there when I watch videos of him. I think James will only turn out to be a special teams contributor and a mediocre LB in the NFL.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 12, 2009 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Laurinitas is just not Ravens "material."
Rexx
by Rexx on Mar 12, 2009 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the Lions' 2nd pick in the first round is tradable
If they do not see something in Matt Stafford and end up choosing Jason Smith with the first pick, Detroit might package together another pick or 2 with that first round pick to move up to around the 10-17 spot to maybe draft Mark Sanchez or Josh Freeman. I am not a Sanchez fan what so ever though.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 11, 2009 7:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe...
…but their list of needed players is probably twice as big as the Ravens. In that light, trading down may give them more picks, but I have a feeling that they will want high talent players. No team’s pick is untradable, but the Lions will want a great deal if they do trade. There is just too much good talent available.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 11, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They won't be able to trade the #1 overall pick
No one wants it because of the signing bonus and contract needed.
Rexx
by Rexx on Mar 12, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that he was talking about them trading their 20th overall pick.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 12, 2009 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They could take Smith with the first pick
and package a trade back into the first round or just wait for either Sanchez or Stafford with their next pick. One of them very well would be available if they trade back up to the first round late teens.
Rexx
by Rexx on Mar 12, 2009 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, I have never really watched too much on Nicks accept for a few clips on ESPN
But that video of him was insane! I can see why you like him so much BAL_Hawk. He got wide open against a very good WVU team. And those catches were crazy. That one where the WVU guys tipped it and he still caught it and dragged one guy for about 8 yards into the end zone. Then of course the behind the back grab. Nuts.
He looks like a fire cracker out there. Always moving forward. I would not mind taking him. Only WR I hope the Ravens dont take is Jeremy Maclin. I just dont see that much in him besides speed. Just my opinion.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 11, 2009 7:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nicks is the real deal.
Like I said before, he reminds me of Irvin and Boldin. I haven’t seen anyone in the draft with better hands. That game he had against WVU was ridiculous. I think he had three touchdowns in that game. He’s got deceptive speed too. If he get’s away from a tackle, he speeds away from the contact with impressive acceleration. Not to mention… I love his attitude. He’s got a swagger.
There is never a sure-thing draft pick, but Nicks is at least a safe pick.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 11, 2009 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maclin
Maclin is my #2 WR in the draft, its not really close, due to his electric return skills. I’m surprised you don’t have any love for him MaLoR. Dude can ball. He could be a less stupid Desean Jackson.
by DT711 on Mar 12, 2009 8:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've compared him to Chad Johnson... and Holmes.
Johnson ran slow at the combine too. Maclin’s forty-time is the only reason that he may slide at all. If he ran a 4.30 at the combine (and I think that he’s capable of it), he’d be a top ten pick. Again, he reminds me of Johnson in his combine workout, but his playing style reminds me of Santonio Holmes… alot like Holmes.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 12, 2009 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great
Your comparing a guy to the steelers. Really want him now. I dont think any player plays like those shitheads in PA. They are all bums.
And BAL_Hawk, your draft is gettin more love then mine…….damn you
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 12, 2009 8:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Holmes can play.
In every game last season, Holmes made a game-breaking play to beat us. We just couldn’t cover him. I think Holmes is a major reason why we signed Foxworth. We need a speedy CB tandem to cover him. Anyway, Holmes was (and I hate to say this) the SB MVP. If we could get a guy like that, why wouldn’t we?
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 12, 2009 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ugggghhhhh
See, I just dont want to admit anything good the steelers. I rather say we lost it before saying they won it. Please dont remind me that he tore us apart.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 12, 2009 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont know
Maybe it is just because I didnt pay too much attention to him during the season. Not really a knock on the guy cause he is a monster out there, but I dont really like that return/wideout player that much. I can say that the Ravens need him, cause who is our punt returner now, go back to the other wideout/return fast mofo, Yamon Figurs? Great, wonderful.
I also think he may be the product of Chase Daniels who I always thought was a great QB. I dont know, if he fell to us for some odd reason and Ozzie took him, then I would be with the guy all the way. Support anything Ozzie does. Just not sure if he is the wideout that we are exactly looking for.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 12, 2009 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
Maclin doesn’t fit into the Ravens as well as some of the other prospects, but he’s just so talented. He would be HARD to pass on (even in the top-10). He’s a game-breaker with the heart of a champion. If I’m going to be objective, I have to rank him in above all the receivers besides Crabtree. Anyway, I seriously doubt he will fall to the Ravens.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 12, 2009 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Besides
Ravens don’t just want a fast WR, they want a big fast strong one, which Hicks and DHB are or will be, but Macklin and Harvin never will.
Rexx
by Rexx on Mar 12, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly why I dont buy into Maclin and Harvine JUST YET.
This league is already fast as hell. Today, running a 4.6 40 yard dash is considered to be pretty slow at some of these positions where back in the day you might have been one of th fastest players out there. They way the league has mostly changed has been strength. These guys are getting stronger and stronger everyday and like to hit harder and harder every game.
Sure, its nice to have that Desean Jackson like speedy guy, but is he really going to come across the middle and catch a pass when needed? Hell no. I am just tired of having average size Receivers, like Maclin and Harvin both are. 6 foot tall, 180 pounds. They can run the outside, but we need someone to go all over the field. Hicks and DHB both have mass on them and only have more room to pack on 10-15 more pounds once they make football their life. It is time for a change and time to get that tall, strong, fast WR that every team wishes to have. And we have never had that guy in our 13 year history.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 12, 2009 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You have Indy and Philly's picks flipped, Indy is 27
but Jerry is my first choice of the guys that could legitimately drop.
I ain't tryin' do you, I'm just tryin' do me
Last album did two, I'm just tryin' do three.
-Young Jeezy "I Luv It
by shake n bake on Mar 11, 2009 10:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That was a typo.
I had it correctly when I wrote it down originally. I fixed it. Thanks for catching that.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 11, 2009 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How does everyone feel about maybe bringing CB Ken Lucas in?
9 year vet who was just cut from the Panthers. If we were to cut Samari, I would be ok with bringing in Lucas and giving him a shot. I mean, the man has had to cover Steve Smith for the past seasons and can take a hit, as Smith knocked out Lucas in training camp with a vicious right hook.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 12, 2009 9:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely.
If we could get him at a reasonable price, he would be a great addition. We need more guys like this… experienced backups to play nickel and dime packages. We can always use more depth too. However, I’m hoping that we can keep Rolle. He’s a little over-paid, but he would be an AWESOME nickel-back. The only question is if he’s happy playing the nickel. I don’t know why he wouldn’t want too. He’d be on the field less, and with his age and condition, that’s a good thing.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 12, 2009 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There are still a ton of decent guys available.
Most teams will wait until after the draft to scarf them up to fill their voids at very cheap prices.
Rexx
by Rexx on Mar 12, 2009 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about baltimore taking Kenny Britt
Anyone think we take a stab at him if he’s there at 26?
FEAR THE NEVERMORE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Benji5203 on Mar 12, 2009 11:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I like Britt...
…but there isn’t much difference between him and other receivers that we could get later. If all other first-round receivers are gone, I’d look at a corner like Alphonso Smith or Darius Butler. We could get a receiver, comparable to Britt, in the second round. If we miss out on all the first-round receivers, I like Brian Robiskie in the second round.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 12, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Na, not at 26
I think we would take Harvin over Britt. He had a good showing at the combine, putting 225 pounds up 26 times, had a decent 40 as well.
If we dont go WR in the first round, I would be happy to take Britt in the second. Hate to compare him this way, but he does remind me of David Boston, just because of his physical build and toughness. Hope he doesnt have the same diet as Boston though. I heard that he never used to eat and would get all his nutrients his body needed from injecting an IV into his arm and pumping liquid supplements in him.
Britt seems to fit that AFC North mold, tough, hard nosed guy. And we already saw what a tough Rutgers 2nd round pick could do in Ray Rice. Be nice to reunite those guys. Just not in the 1st round.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 12, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention
All the Steroids Boston pumped into his body
by DT711 on Mar 12, 2009 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think baltimore is going to trade out of this pick. If there isnt and player that ozzie believes will make a huge differences on our team, We trade the pick for an early 2nd and 3rd round pick.
FEAR THE NEVERMORE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Benji5203 on Mar 12, 2009 4:20 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think we trade down
I think someone we have ranked high on our board will slip to us, whether that is Pettigrew, Nicks or DHB, I’m not sure, but I see it happening.
It always does when we pick late in the 1st rd.
by DT711 on Mar 12, 2009 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.
You nailed it. I think that it will be one of those three players, or it may be Maualuga if he falls. I’ve also heard that the Ravens are interested in Darius Butler, but I think they’re hoping to get him in the second round.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 12, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
We always get a good player when we pick late in the first round. Lets see….
Ed Reed
Todd Heap
Ben Grubbs
Mark Clayton
2 of 4 have already made the Pro Bowl multiple times and I suspect that Grubbs will at some point. The verdict is still out on Clayton, but worse case, hes a nice complementary piece at WR, and a solid #2 for almost any team.
I almost think Oz like picking later, because it simplifies things for him. By the time we pick late in the first, i bet there is usually one or two guys he had ranked in the top 15 on his draft board. Makes it a no brainer for him.
On another note, why haven’t more GM’s copied his style? Drafting strictly for need is not smart, especially in the first round, yet teams continue to do it, year in, year out. I think I could do a better job then half those ass clowns. Matt Millen really lowered the bar, my dog could pick better players then him. What a joke that was.
by DT711 on Mar 12, 2009 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but those were value picks
What im saying is that if there isnt any value in the later rounds, we should trade. Grubbs, Reed and Heap were consider the best at their postion when they were drafted and mark clayton was considered the #2 WR that year and would have been the best if he was 3 inchs taller. Hopefully Pettigrew falls to use.
FEAR THE NEVERMORE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Benji5203 on Mar 12, 2009 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the same
With 4 picks between the 33 and the 90, we could get a good WR like K Britt or B Robiskie, a good DE LIKE M Johnson or J Gilbert (for future replace of Pryce), more depth at CB with Jarius Byrd or Victor “macho” Harris (very physicals) and a good RT for the future…
So I think that we could have a great draft, and not so big contracts, trading down our 1st pick and using our 2nd and 3rd
THE MEXICAN RAVEN
by JORGE NITALES on Mar 19, 2009 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great points
We have 5 picks in the top 100. And I guarentee Ozzie only picks from those top 100 players. Most likely he will have a guy ranked at like 50-60th best player available and he will be there in the late 3rd round.
Anytime you can get 5 players off of your top 100, that is usually going to turn out the way you want it.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 19, 2009 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Based on what's remaining,..
we could easily trade up a few picks to grab someone still on our board, and perhaps might even trade down a couple of slots if a few of the guys are still there, or even none of them remain.
Rexx
by Rexx on Mar 12, 2009 10:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
thats what im saying
FEAR THE NEVERMORE DEFENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Benji5203 on Mar 13, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's amazing...
…how much things change in a matter of days. My mock draft for today would be MUCH different than it was when I wrote this one… It’s going to be much different when I update it next week.
I think the Bengals are going to draft BJ Raji. That changes everything.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 14, 2009 6:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
1. Detroit Lions
QB Matthew Stafford, Georgia ok
Stafford has the arm that the Lions are looking for. The new regime has done nothing to improve the quarterback position in free agency. This tells me that they will draft a quarterback. They could draft an offensive tackle first and then try to get a quarterback second. However, there aren’t any safe bets in the draft this year, and Stafford is the best option. If they don’t take him, I think that it would be a huge mistake.
2. St. Louis Rams
OT Jason Smith, Baylor ok
With Orlando Pace gone, the Rams need a new franchise left tackle. In fact, they needed one while he was still there. Smith had a meteoric rise during the scouting combine, and I don’t think that it’s a coincidence that St. Louis released Pace only days after the combine. I’m pretty sure that the Rams will draft a tackle, and I’m guessing it will be Smith. He has more upside than any other tackle prospect.
3. Kansas City Chiefs ok
LB Aaron Curry, Wake Forest
The Chiefs are thrilled to get Curry and they should be. In my opinion, he is the most talented prospect in this year’s draft. It’s even better now that they have Vrabel to teach Curry how to play linebacker in the NFL. This is a solid pick. If Curry is on the board, the Chiefs will draft him.
4. Seattle Seahawks ok
OT Eugene Monroe, Virginia
Seattle’s pick was hard to figure out. I wanted to rule out Crabtree since they signed Houshmandzadeh, but I think that Crabtree is still a possibility. It’s an outside chance, but it is possible. When it comes down to it, the Seahawks will probably draft a tackle. It’s hard and rare to find elite talent on the offensive line. They should take advantage of the opportunity, but don’t expect them to pass on Crabtree lightly.
5. Cleveland Browns ok
DE Brian Orakpo, Texas
I have a feeling that the Browns are going to do something stupid with this pick. I don’t know why. That’s why I almost had them taking Malcolm Jenkins here. They should take Orakpo. Even an idiot can see that he’s the best pass rusher available, and that’s where they need help. On the other hand, I wouldn’t rule out Crabtree or Raji. I think that Crabtree is a better prospect, but everyone in Cleveland knows that they need defensive help. Raji would help. However, they already have Rogers, and they think that he’s good for some reason. Anyway, Orakpo makes the most sense here.
6. Cincinnati Bengals ? they need ol there defense was rank 12 after palmer was injuried also they need WR and aDL LB CB
DT BJ Raji, Boston College
I originally had Crabtree going to the Bengals. It’s still possible. However, I remember last year’s draft. The Bengals wanted Sedrick Ellis badly. Obviously, that didn’t work out, and they need defensive line help more than ever. It will be hard to pass on Crabtree, but in the end, the Bengals need to take the player that will help them the most.
7. Oakland Raiders no 40 time wount draft also need O line
WR Michael Crabtree, Texas Tech
Al Davis may be forced to make a solid draft pick. If Crabtree is gone, they probably would take Maclin, which would be a huge reach. Oakland fans are hoping that this scenario pans out, and in all honesty, it’s looking very likely. If Crabtree is available, I’m sure that old Al will draft him. He loves flashy, athletic playmakers. Crabtree fits the bill.
8. Jacksonville Jaguars*
OT Michael Oher, Mississippi
Jacksonville wants to see Raji fall to this spot. However, they need help along the defensive and offensive line. Since Raji is gone, the Jaguars take the next best offensive lineman in the draft. Oher is a solid football player and in my opinion, only a notch below Monroe. Jacksonville could also use a wide receiver, but I think that Maclin is a reach here. If Crabtree fell to them by some madness, expect them to draft him immediately.
9. Green Bay Packers k
DE Everette Brown, Florida State
Green Bay has a new defensive coordinator this season, and they need players to fit into their new 34 scheme. Brown is one of the fastest risers in the draft. Some people believe that he’s the best pass rusher in the nation. He’s a fantastic athlete and will be an excellent outside linebacker in a 34 scheme. It’s a good fit for the Packers and fills one of their biggest needs.
10. San Francisco Forty-Niners no singltary said that he likes his 2 QB
QB Mark Sanchez, USC
I think that Sanchez is the smartest pick for the Niners, and as of right now, I think that they will take him. He may not be a great starter right away, but he will definitely be better than any quarterback that they currently have. Now that Singletary has the job, he needs to start thinking about the future.
11. Buffalo Bills k
LB Aaron Maybin, Penn State
12. Denver Broncos ?? with cutler wanting a trade
LB Brian Cushing, USC
13. Washington Redskins maybe a trade or Pass rusher or trade
OT Andre Smith, Alabama
14. New Orleans Saints* d help
CB, Vontae Davis, Illinois
15. Houston Texans k
CB Malcolm Jenkins, Ohio State
16. San Diego Chargers* k
LB Rey Maualuga, USC
17. New York Jets no because they need a Qb
WR Jeremy Maclin, Missouri
18. Chicago Bears QB also line help both sides
WR Darius Heyward-Bey, Maryland
19. Tampa Bay Buccaneers fine
QB Josh Freeman, Kansas State
20. Detroit Lions* k
OT Eben Britton, Arizona
21. Philadelphia Eagles no they need a left
TE Brandon Pettigrew, Oklahoma State
22. Minnesota Vikings fine
CB Alphonso Smith, Wake Forest
23. New England Patriots ? maybe
DE Larry English, Northern Illinois
24. Atlanta Falcons they may add a weapon for ryan also there RT retire so they need to replace him
LB Clay Matthews, USC
25. Miami Dolphins maybe d help
WR Percy Harvin, Florida
26. Baltimore Ravens petigrew , dhb are now avilable
WR Hakeem Nicks, North Carolina
Even though I wanted Heyward-Bey fall to the Ravens, I could not betray my objectivity. I just don’t see Darius being available here. If he is available, the Ravens would definitely draft him over Nicks. Cameron likes fast receivers.
Instead, the Ravens take one of my favorite players in the draft. He’s tough like Boldin and reliable like Irvin. He has the best hands in the draft. There are questions about his deep-speed and level of competition. However, there were questions about Flacco’s footwork and level of competition last year. That didn’t seem to bother Ozzie then. This is a classic Raven pick. It’s not sexy, but it’s solid and underrated.
27. Indianapolis Colts no they got 2 replace harrison
DT Peria Jerry, Mississippi
28. Philadelphia Eagles fine
RB Chris Wells, Ohio State
29. New York Giants fine
WR Kenny Britt, Rutgers
30. Tennessee Titans fine
CB Darius Butler, Connecticut
31. Arizona Cardinals fine
RB Knowshon Moreno, Georgia
32. Pittsburgh Steelers*
C Alex Mack, California
no CB the McFadden
lmk what u think
by 2000 ravens on Mar 18, 2009 5:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Interesting thoughts...
…although some of them are a bit obvious. However, most of your suggestions indicate that the team would always select need over available talent. This is simply not the case. Teams will keep their needs in mind, but they want value more than anything. That’s what I tried to simulate in this mock.
In the 1996 NFL draft, everyone thought that the Ravens NEEDED a running back. They projected us taking Lawrence Phillips, who was an incredible bust. Instead, Ozzie drafted Ogden, and the rest is history.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 18, 2009 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What the hell is an Ogden?
Elaborate….
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Mar 18, 2009 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pretty close
to what should happen. However, to me Mock Drafts are almost worthless as when was the last time that there were no trades in the first round? That always changes everything from that point on. You just know someone will make a trade and throw off the rest of the draft. The question we all should be debating is: Which team will pull the trigger for what pick of the first round? That would be a good topic, eh?
Rexx
by Rexx on Mar 19, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely true.
Mocks are highly inaccurate, and in the end, it’s impossible to predict the final outcome. I just find them entertaining.
by BAL_Hawk on Mar 19, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
