"Steeler Football is 60 Minutes!"
So said Pittsburgh Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin when being interviewed after the game as he hoisted the Lombardi Trophy for the record sixth time in Steelers history. He went on to say it wasn't pretty and they wouldn't earn any style points but this is how they did it all season long.
Ravens fans certainly knew this was the case by virtue of their three losses, two in the last minute or later and the third, the AFC Championship Game, wasn't decided until Steelers safety returned and interception for a touchdown with a little over four minutes left in the game.
The Arizona Cardinals had played well over their heads throughout the post season and with just over two minutes left in the game, thought they had Super Bowl 43 in the bag. Think again, Arizona, this isn't your Philadelphia Eagles, Carolina Panthers or Minnesota Vikings. These are the Pittsburgh Steelers, who sometimes decide to not even show up for the first 58 minutes or so of a game and then rip your heart out as they "steel" a game they had no business winning. Yesterday was really no different than that scenerio. Yes, the Steelers won 27-23, but look at the possibilities. Seven of their points came on a 100 yard interception return when the Cardinals were driving and about to take a 14-10 lead into halftime. Typical Steelers get the turnover and turn it into points to extend their halftime lead to 17-7. That's a 14 point turnaround that might have made a huge difference in the outcome.
However, none of that mattered to Ben Roethlisberger. In typical fashion, he danced and twisted and just barely managed to stay on his feet and find the open receivers that he did so many times to our Ravens and to every other team that the Steelers faced this season. Roethlisberger certainly is not pretty, will not have great stats (although he did last night) and will not earn those style points that Coach Tomlin was talking about. All he does is win, and now has won two Super Bowls in his six years in the league. Not too shabby for a big, ugly dork, huh?
As a Ravens fan, it kills me to know that now not only do we get to hear about how the Steelers beat us three times last season, but now we have to endure the taunts that they're Super Bowl Champions once again. I guess the only good thing I will try to counter that with is that it will feel that much sweeter to kick their butts next season!
0 recs |
29 comments
|
Comments
It is kind of a good thing.
Them winning last night should finally shut everyone up who says that the AFC North is not the best division in football. It has been for the past 4 years or so because of Ravens and Steelers, two teams who can beat anyone regardless of the situation because of great defense.
I am excited that we get to play the superbowl champs twice again next year and prove yet again that we are for real.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Feb 2, 2009 9:43 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
however however although it seems at times
The stock market will never recover, our armies will never again be #1, and our children will drink filthy water for the rest of their lives - HST
by the fix is in on Feb 2, 2009 9:50 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well that sucked...
But, don’t let anyone get away with saying the 2008 Steelers had a better defense than the 2000 Ravens. Hell they allowed exactly as many points in the Superbowl as the Ravens allowed in their entire 2000 postseason.
It sucks because I really wanted Kurt Warner to win. He’s an incredible quarterback. Could you imagine where we would have been had we signed Kurt Warner instead of Steve McNair?
by math_geek on Feb 2, 2009 10:14 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Same Position?
McNair didnt have the best WR duo in the league to throw to. Yes, I do feel that Warner is a better all around QB, but his recent successes have come from his opportunities to throw it to arguably the best down field WR in the game and one of the best possession WR in the game, Fitz and Boldin.
McNair was a good fit for us in 2006 and easily could have helped us again in 2007, except a plague of injuries swept through B-More. He was a game manager, one of the best of all time. That is what we wanted, let our defense do their thing, give it to Jamal, and hit Mase or Heap a few times.
I dont think Mason, Clayton, D-Will, or Heap could do some of the things that those 2 WR can do, ESPECIALLY Fitzgerald, it is not fair for the other team when he is on the field, simply an amazing athlete and person.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Feb 2, 2009 12:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Gee, you think!?
Warner having the luxury of throwing to Isaac Bruce and Tory Holt in St. Louis and now Fitzgerald and Boldin in Arizona, is pretty good targets to help make any QB look better. If Warner was here, are you telling me that he would have led us to the Promised Land?
Rexx
by Rexx on Feb 2, 2009 4:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I am not saying he would lead us there at all.
I think MathGeek is though.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Feb 2, 2009 6:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, I do feel that Warner is a better all around QB
Hey, no question Warner would have a harder time with our skill position players. But at the end of the day, he’s a precision passer. I think he would have been better than McNair in Baltimore, especially in 2007.
I’m not saying McNair was a bad deal, just that Warner was/is a better quarterback, and I think that includes our team.
by math_geek on Feb 2, 2009 8:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I see what you are saying
And we have seen how good Mason can be when you have a precision passer (Joe Flacco). Who knows, he could have brought some fire and excitement to this city.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Feb 2, 2009 8:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I could have been better than McNair in '07!
But how much better could Warner have been in 2006, except for the Colts finale!?
Rexx
by Rexx on Feb 3, 2009 9:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the kudo’s Rexx.
Next year we shall enjoy some epic battles again. Tuff, physical football…
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by drinkyourmilkshake on Feb 2, 2009 3:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Cardinals win IF they had a respectable right tackle. Warner had constant pressure from that side and still managed 377 yards! He didn’t need to win to cement his Hall of Fame induction. Wow. BUT, the team of destiny won. No other way of explaining all Bens’ crazy chuck and ducks and wacky Steeler returns. Smoke and mirrors and poof- a SB title.
by raven on Feb 2, 2009 6:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm?
Bens’ crazy chuck and ducks
I’d like to think of it as an unorthadox quarter backing style. Seems to me he has been playing that way ALL season due to a shakey O line. How long does he have to do it before it isn’t “luck” anymore?
wacky Steeler returns
I’d say this was DPOY James Harrison taking a hundred yarder to the house!! I look at it more as a sweet ass interception, sweet ass blocking, and a sweet ass return.
Smoke and mirrors and poof- a SB title
Six to be exact. You seem rather bitter, which is understandable I suppose.
by Cdsumm on Feb 3, 2009 4:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just part of the rivalry
Bitter? I think not. Envious? You bet!
Rexx
by Rexx on Feb 4, 2009 9:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Be proud my little bitter black birds
First off I have to say, I’m beaming ear to ear that there is an add for the Super Bowl XLIII Champions, the Pittsburgh Steelers, on this web site. HAHAHAHA! Fantastic!
Secondly, keep your head up black birds. You came in second in the AFC. That’s pretty impressive, especially w/a rookie QB. And it’s about time. As a life long Steelers fan I was hoping for a continuation of the Billick/Boller regime (sorry, busy watching highlights of the Steelers winning number 6 on ESPN) for a totally easy AFC North division. For the love of Pete I could not understand WHY that guy was in there for so long. I now actually think you guys are a legitimate threat w/Wacco Flacco behind center.
Say what you want my little bitter black birds: The Steelers went 12-4 in one of the toughest schedules in the past few decades. They beat you, 3 times, fair and square. They won the Super Bowl. Big Ben is one of the top, if not the best QB’s, in the NFL today. The evidence is there. Poke holes if you want. Make accusations of “unfair calls” and “dirty plays” all you want. Just know traffic flows both ways.
If it were ANY other team other than my Steelers I would have been rooting for the Cards. You have to among the long loosing history to the outstanding American Tilman, the incredible human that Warner is and the absolute class that the talented Fitzgerald brings to the table.
Go Steelers!!!
P.S. Polamalu is the BEST safety in the NFL (he now has TWO rings to prove it).
P.S.S. Thanks Ravens for bringing great games to the Steelers (seriously, much respect!)
P.S.S.S. Dick LeBeau to the HOF in Canton NOW!
Don D.
by hobbeslax on Feb 4, 2009 5:12 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I hate you
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Feb 5, 2009 12:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess I’ll just answer the lunacy in the order it appears.
It’s laughable to say that the Steelers had one of the toughest schedules in decades. What season were you watching? First off, let’s not even count the four teams to which they lost. If your argument is that Pittsburgh overcame a tough schedule, losses don’t make your point for you. As to the wins, nine came from teams that didn’t make it to the playoffs. They get four auto-wins from the division from the Browns and Bengals, and the Jaguars finished 5-11. That’s five out of twelve that aren’t even worth mentioning. The Texans, Redskins, and Chargers all went 8-8, which doesn’t exactly make them building blocks for “one of the toughest schedules in the past few decades.” That leaves the Patriots and Cowboys (who didn’t even make the post-season), and the Ravens, whom you beat twice. That’s doesn’t leave you with much of an argument. Looks to me like the Steelers had a pretty easy schedule. We should all be so lucky as to have “one of the toughest schedules in the past few decades.”
It is an absolute stretch to say that Roethlisberger is one of the best QB’s in the league. This season, he had nearly as many interceptions as TD’s (15:17) and an 80.1 QB rating. Joe Flacco (without a great receiving corp) had 14 TD’s and 12 interceptions with a rating of 80.3. Stats don’t tell the whole story, but I just want you to know the company that Ben keeps. Roethlisberger has a top-rated defense to make up for his deficiencies and give him good field position. He has great receivers that make ridiculous plays on the ball they wouldn’t have to with a REAL top-tier QB (Manning, Brady, or Brees). And finally, he has an officiating crew that refuses to call holding on his offensive line when he spends 30 seconds scrambling in the backfield. He shows some occasional flashes of greatness, and he might up his game to a higher level of play someday in the future, but he is most definitely not there yet. At this point, though, he’s more likely to suffer a career-ending injury because of his offensive line than to have his name mentioned with the real greats.
Having Super Bowl rings proves nothing about the talent of a player. Polamalu has two rings? Congratulations to him and the other 52 guys on the roster (not to mention coaching staff and front office). Trent Dilfer has a Super Bowl ring. Are you going to argue that he’s a top QB? Honestly, I didn’t see Polamalu do much of anything at all in the Super Bowl except double cover a receiver. If he’s the best safety in the league, I’d expect him to elevate his play in the biggest game of the season and get more than two tackle assists. In the second half of the game, the Cardinals lit up the Steelers secondary. Where was the best safety in the league then?
Water covers 2/3 of the Earth's surface. Ed Reed covers the rest.
by Ampallang on Feb 8, 2009 9:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS....OF THE WORLD...AGAIN!
How’s the view from the back, looking at our tail lights? You guys had your chances this season to step up and couldnt get it done. 3 -0 this season! You only will go down now that you are on the verge of losing the heart and soul of your team, Ray Lewis. Good luck with battling it out with the Browns and Bungles at the bottom of the division!
by Steeler Ric on Feb 6, 2009 7:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Ampallang,
I totally agree. Dilfer has a ring and he blows. Way to cut him right after the Super Bowl win. Strong move. I did see Polamalu int. Flacco in the third win over the Ravens and leap over two lines to practically rip his head of to stop a 4th and goal. Don’t see Reed doing all that. Oh yeah, as far as Reed being better b/c he’s “ball hawk” how did that pick-six to seal the deal to get into the big game by Polamalu taste? Big Ben won against top D’s and behind a questionable O-line. He’s great enough to engineer 3 winning drives against your #2 defense.
Where was the best safety during the second half of the Super Bowl you ask? He was on the winning side of the football field. Where was yours?
Don D.
by hobbeslax on Feb 15, 2009 9:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
It took you over a week to respond to me, and this garbage is the best you can bring? This is typical of lame shit I’ve come to expect from Steelers fans.
I noticed you didn’t mention anything about the Steelers’ schedule this time around. You went from “one of the toughest schedules in the past few decades” to zero pretty quickly. In light of having no actual evidence to back up the ridiculous claim (other than just the popular opinion of Steelers bloggers), it’s probably most convenient to just not mention it any longer.
And now Ben Roethlesberger has gone from “one of the top, if not the best QB’s, in the NFL today” to being good enough to just barely beat us three times? Honestly, if you’re going to pretend that he’s the only player out there, at least learn how to spell his last name. “Big Ben” has become such a convenient moniker for all the Steelers fans out there that can’t spell more than three letters at a time. When it comes down to it, the Steelers offense is just good enough to win against top teams because it’s being backed by the top-rated defense. Seven of their 12 wins was by a touchdown or less (and three of the others came against Ohio teams). It’s become pretty popular to bash on the offensive line for all Roethlesberger’s woes, but he’s AT LEAST partially to blame. When he holds on to the ball too long and manages to dump it off at the last second for that miracle first down, he’s brilliant and the second coming of Christ. But when he holds on to it too long and gets the sack, all of a sudden his line is porous. Also, for all that time he’s scrambling and there’s almost NEVER a holding call, you have to give some credit to the line for solid — if impromptu — blocking. And how about those receivers? With the likes of Holmes and Ward (and that TE was pretty good, too), even Kyle Boller could look competent. So how about we stop pretending that Roethlesberger is some kind of god-like, one man army and give kudos to all 10 people that deserve them (sorry, “Fast” Willie Parker is all bark and no bite).
I’ve apparently seen all the evidence I need in the Reed vs. Polamalu debate! Troy got an interception, helped stop a fourth-and-goal, and played in the Super Bowl? Stop the press and get this man his pedestal! This is seriously all you have? I’ll be the first person to agree that there’s an argument on both sides of the debate, but this is seriously the lamest post on this subject I’ve seen yet. You missed Reed intercepting the ball? Or are you saying that you don’t see Reed intercepting Flacco? I can definitely agree that Polamalu is more likely to intercept Flacco than is Reed, so you’ve got me by the balls there. Your original argument was that Polamalu was the best safety in the NFL because he has Super Bowl rings, but neither his appearance in the Super Bowl, nor his play there are any kind of evidence as to who is the best safety. If you want to continue this debate, get your head out of your ass and present some actual evidence (Polamalu will appreciate it) to somebody that actually cares (I won’t).
Water covers 2/3 of the Earth's surface. Ed Reed covers the rest.
by Ampallang on Feb 16, 2009 8:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
Thats how you respond to a retard right there Ampallang. Good Job bro.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Feb 16, 2009 1:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you, thank you! I’ll be here all night!
Water covers 2/3 of the Earth's surface. Ed Reed covers the rest.
by Ampallang on Feb 16, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What response did you read?
Were you drunk when you responded? Since I work with children diagnosed with mental challenges I will not stoop to your level and retort with “retard”. Your response is nonsensical and absurd. For one thing I did not respond right away because I have what’s called a life that includes a job and social life (try getting a girlfriend Ampallang after your balls descend and get out of your mom’s basement).
Try reading this for some perspective on Ben Roethlisberger (I actually spelled it right compared to your critique).
The only mistake in my post that I will refer to is that the best safety in the NFL stopped the ravens on 4th and inches and not 4th and goal.
As for Mr Malor, it’s nice to see losers unite.
Don D.
by hobbeslax on Feb 18, 2009 10:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Where does one even begin to respond to prose of this caliber? All I can think to say is this:
“…what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.”
Since you apparently can’t support any of your ludicrous assertions with anything more than petulance and that shitty Romo-Roethlisberger article, I’m washing my hands of all this. Out.
Water covers 2/3 of the Earth's surface. Ed Reed covers the rest.
by Ampallang on Feb 18, 2009 5:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Im not a loser
Winner winner chicken dinner!!!
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Feb 18, 2009 8:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You're right, you're not a loser
I’m just fired up. My apologies. I love chicken for dinner too.
Don D.
by hobbeslax on Feb 18, 2009 8:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
P*ssy
Support: See my above responses. Apparently you’re illiterate so have someone else explain it to you and have them use small, simple words.
Roethlisberger/Romo Article: Again, have someone read and explain it to you as to understand the message. Sorry there wasn’t more pictures for you.
“Prose”? Please! Way to readith thy thesaurus thou jackass.
Don D.
by hobbeslax on Feb 18, 2009 8:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well, I work at a petting zoo and round up the Donkeys for all the children
So I do not appreciate you using Jackass and I will not stoop to your animal abuse level.
Lol, please relax, its the internet and you dont know anything about our lives as we dont know anything about yours.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Feb 18, 2009 8:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 








