Teams Virtually Ignoring League's Concussion Policy
When the NFL came out with a stronger statement on how teams should address any head injury or concussion, I went out on a limb and said it was nowhere near specific enough. Many brain injury doctors said there should be minimum limits on when players should be able to return to play beyond the specific game and practice when the injury occurred. Allowing a player to return the very next game regardless of the extent of the injury is irresponsible to me, and shows how much the teams focus more on winning than on an individual players' health. Even our Baltimore Ravens are not innocent, as it was reported that after receiving a concussion on the game's first play in Green Bay, placekicker Billy Cundiff returned to the game multiple times and still played this past week after appearing on the team's injury report all week.
Keeping Ben Roethlisberger out of one game and then allowing him to return the next after the guy has had multiple concussions this season and reportedly at least two more identified in his career does not make sense regardless of the stats. The simple fact that he passed a battery of tests does not make his brain completely healthy enough to withstand the pounding inside of the helmet that it receives every time he steps on the football field. These tests, supposedly administered by an "independent" source, were designed and sold to the league by a physician who is on the Steelers medical staff. So much for "independent!"
In addition to Roethlisberger, the Arizona Cardinals Kurt Warner also missed a game the same week as Ben and then came back to play the very next week. Not that it matters, even though the naysayers will say it does, both QB's had very good games in the week they initially returned from their most recent concussion. However, the second week after returning, coincidentally both of them played very poorly, making me wonder if their brain injuries had anything to do with it?
In Thursday night's game that the Pittsburgh Steelers lost to the Cleveland Browns, Roethlisberger was sacked eight times. How often do you see Ben running around outside of the pockert, seemingly about to be sacked only to find an open receiver for a huge gain in their drives for the game winning points. Roethlisberger has made a career out of that alone against the Ravens, yet he couldn't get it done against the Browns? That looks to me like a guy who is not processing information in his brain as fast as he usually does, signaling an injury that has just not healed.
As obvious, in Monday night's loss at San Francisco, Warner was seen on the sidelines early in the game shaking his head and blinking his eyes hard as if trying to shake out the cobwebs after getting hit hard in the previous series. Inexplicably, he went back into the game and had easily the worst game of his season.
Look at the stats of those two guys in week 14:
Name Comp/Att Yards TD INT QB Rating
Roethlisber 18/32 201 0 0 75.1
Warner 16/29 178 0 2 44.9
I have gone as far as saying on this site that I truly believe that the Steelers would have won both of their past two games against Oakland and Cleveland if their backup QB, Dennis Dixon was in there and now I hope that since they are pretty much out of the playoff picture, they even strongly consider sitting Ben out the remaining three games for the sake of his future career and overall health. Doubtful either Ben or the Steelers would concur with that. These players, along with any other ones who are receiving concussions at an alarming pace, need to be sat down by new rules for minimum time periods of at least one game for those receiving their first concussion and at least two for those sustaining multiple ones. The independent sources need to be truly independent. Until the league can set stricter standards with industry approval outside of the NFL's scope of authority, these players will be the ones who pay the price later in their lives while the NFL and the teams collect on their investments right now.
The opinions posted here are those of the administrator of this blog and his loyal readers. They are in no way official comments from the team, and should not be misconstued as such, even though he thinks he could do just as well or even a better job!
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The league is not serious about this.
They could reduce or eliminate many injuries ranging from broker hands and fingers through cracked ribs and concussions. As little as a 1/2 inch of high tech padding on the outside of the helmets would do it. All of a sudden the helmet is no longer a weapon. They can still put a nice shiny paint job on them. They would look good but this is a gladiator sport and the NFL litterally wants to hear players “crack heads” like a couple of rams at the rut. Look at the the opening to MNF, it pictures the teams helmets smashing into each other and exploding. Yes, I go to the race to see the crashes. But at least NASCAR does everything possible to protect the drivers. I love seeing players lit up on the football field. But I think taking the helmet away as a weapon is a good thing.
Good point.
The article I read in October’s GQ said that in the old days thehelmets didn’t offer as much protection nd the players never led with their heads, which saved them and their opponents from serious injuries including paralying ones. Now the helmet protects the wearer so well it has become more of a weapon than protection.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Dec 17, 2009 11:44 AM EST up reply actions
Excellent point...
“The independent sources need to be truly independent. Until the league can set stricter standards with industry approval outside of the NFL’s scope of authority, these players will be the ones who pay the price later in their lives while the NFL and the teams collect on their investments right now.”
Unfortunately the NFLPA will never allow this to happen. The distrust between owners and the PA is so thick, neither side would budge if one thinks their getting an edge over the other. The edge in this case being something that is actually supposed to help injured players sustain their careers, but in the “what have you done for me lately?” revved up game of football, what player would want to sit out a couple games while incentive rich contracts demand that they be on the field getting that extra sack, pick, yard, or TD?
The only thing the Union and the Owners share is
their refusal to help out the older players. The Veterans asked both groups to contribute one half of 1% each to their health fund, which would total $20 million per YEAR! Alas, both the owners and the NFLPA voted “No.” Class groups, eh?
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Dec 17, 2009 6:06 PM EST up reply actions
Come on MaLoR
The what would he wear at the back of the yellow bus!?
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Dec 17, 2009 6:07 PM EST up reply actions
While I like good physical football there are many shots delivered each week that just makes you sick inside. It’s just not right to be hit with some of the intensity that can be delivered. I seriously wouldn’t mind them cutting down on some of hese vicious hits if they can.
I’d like to see them eliminate the the shot (not wrap tackle) to the back of a receivers legs as he is up in the air going for a catch. That hit always flips the man on his neck and head.
Wimpy? Maybe but life changing injuries are getting ridiculous.
this is true
as much as i love the bone-crunching hits that sound like car accidents, i know what it felt like to get dropped in middle school football. i can’t imagine what that impact feels like when you get it from a 250-lb missile.
players lives and health is most important.
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
Unfortunately, football is such a violent game
the players bigger, stronger and faster than ever before. You can’t expect these players to hold off on hitting a player when he’s up in the air trying to catch a pass anymore than you can expect a player to hold off hitting the QB. You just need to accept certain risks about the game or change the equipment to either protect the hitter AND the hit-ee!
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Dec 17, 2009 6:09 PM EST up reply actions
i wonder if the new guidlines will reach the smear the queer level. now that was a brutal game with no scoring or quarters.
We were a little more politically correct,..
…as we played a game just called “Tackle the guy w/ the ball.” No rules, no goals, no time, just whomever was stupid enough to pick up the ball would get gang tackled and pummeled. Then he’d either get up and try to snatch the ball up and run, only to be slammed down once again, and again, and again. Or it would just sit there on the ground until someone else felt brave enough to take it. The biggest, oldest guy would always try to take it and drag all of us around the yard until our sheer weight would plop him down. We played until enough people quit or we were just laying on the ground all tired out.
Ahhh,…the good ole days with no refs throwing penalty flags.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Dec 18, 2009 9:05 AM EST up reply actions
great game. nothing like having your face planted into a frozen uneven piece of turf after you throw the ball back up into the air hoping for mercy. funny how kids 8-14 all played at the same neighborhood level. the height and weight differences make me cringe even today. how we survived is a miracle after playing on every known surface to man. i can’t believe we were never creamed by a car with all the street ball games and darting between vehicles. you need a lot of luck to get threw the early years. kids with X-Boxes are playing it way toooo safe.
























