Perhaps Ravens Played Flat Last Night For A Reason
Everyone from the announcers to the media to the fans were ragging on our Ravens about the boring, unoriginal and "flat" play last night in their 16-0 shutout victory over the woeful Cleveland Browns. The offense could only muster a little under 300 yards of total offense that was giving up an average of over 400 yards per game. They joined the Browns in combining to have the only non-scoring first half in the 2009 NFL season thus far. The Ravens could only muster 9 points of scoring offense all game, and scored 13 of their 16 points in a 17 second span of the third quarter.
But as the title suggests, perhaps the Ravens played "flat" on purpose for a reason that borders on strategy with a side helping of over confidence?
Everyone knew the Ravens were clearly the better team going into the game and it wouldn't be surprising to know that the team was likely already looking ahead to their next two opponents, much less the remainder of the season. While the team knew it desperately needed a win to remain in the hunt for a post season berth, they probably figured that just short of showing up was going to be good enough to pull out a win, as ugly as it may look to the rest of the football world watching last night.
I'm sure the team knew what it had to do to win the game, and only opened the playbook far enough to get the job done. Without revealing anything in that binder of formations that the Indianapolis Colts and the Pittsburgh Steelers could practice to prevent, the Ravens just concentrated in bullying the Browns enough to score more points while playing solid defense. Hence the game totals in plays ran from scrimmage, 36 rushing versus only 19 passes. The 19 passing attempts include an ill-timed 3rd down trick play with Ray Rice trying to get the ball downfield to a wide open Todd Heap, underthrowing him for an incompletion. Why they even brought out that play, much less on a third and two where they could have probably just ran the ball for the first down with the game in hand at that point confounded me as well as the announcers.
So before you decide to go off on the team for its bland game plan, try to see that the coaching staff couldn't care less what everyone thinks about their strategy as long as it ends with a victory, which it did. They may be a lot smarter than they are given credit for, as they got the win without revealing anything unusual about the game plan that the Colts and Steelers can take away from the game. However, the defense did shut out an NFL team, which has only happened a handful of times this season and is still a sense of pride regardless of the team they beat. This defense needed this shutout and can use the solid play from many of the guys who have not gotten a lot of reps this year, such as Dwan Edwards, Lardarius Webb, Jameel McClain and even Paul Kruger. Both corners played well, especially Fabian Washington against the run. Terrell Suggs has every reason to be angry at Brady Quinn, who had no reason whatsoever to be blocking Suggs after throwing an interception, much less below the knees and his post game excuse was obviously lame. Losing Suggs for the next stretch of games will hurt this team, as well as the loss of safety Haruki Nakamura, who broke his right ankle on the opening kickoff and should miss the rest of the season. Get well props to both of them, along with Tavares Gooden who suffered another concussion and Todd Heap, who bruised his chest late in the game.
On the Browns side, here's hoping return man Josh Cribbs is okay after taking a hard shot on the game's final play, although Dwan Edwards hit was legal and besides, the play was a stupid one for a team trailing by 16 points.
Finally, we can't end this post without mentioning the pathetic job our placekicker has done all season. Sorry to call you out Steven Hauschka, but when you put on the team's colors, you are in the spotlight and are only as good as your kicks, which have been hooking left since the first game of the season. Missing those easy ones will keep the talk about letting Matt Stover go fresh on the tongues on your detractors. While I was in favor of replacing Stover, he was money inside the 40 but was shaky beyond that. You are missing wide left regardless of the distance and have pretty much proven that the pressure of kicking in the NFL is well beyond your capabilities. Now the team should be signing someone else as they have tried out other kickers but for some reason decideed to give you another chance, which you blew big time last night. While the readers of The Beatdown know whom I'd like to see here, at this point I'm sure everyone agrees that anyone other than you will be an upgrade, as there can't be a single person over at One Winning Drive that secretly or openly has any confidence when you trot onto the field.
Other than that, I'm not discouraged, I'm satisfied that we are where we needed to be before last night to set us up for the next two games which will absolutely define our season and with that, our post season.
0 recs |
48 comments
|
Comments
So now what?
While a win is a win is a win I believe there were some serious problems last night that foreshadowed bad things for us in the coming weeks. More to the point, if the Browns are able to drop into a cover 2 and keep Flacco scrambling for his life, how can we expect to gain any success in the passing game against teams like Indy and Pitt? Yes Willis finally got some carries which was good to see, but does this now mean we are serious about going back to the running game first? And the undisciplined penalties are still there. Not as many on defense because the Browns barely attempted to go down field but Peyton and company will not be as gun shy.
by Dynamo38 on Nov 17, 2009 10:59 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
“So now what?”
We enjoy some long awaited tailgating at M&T and settle in to watch Manning slice up our D while Flacco struggles to find anyone beyond 8 yards and Mason. Kelly Washington and Clayton might just want to climb up in the stands and have some chicken fingers with me. If they can afford it.
by raven on Nov 17, 2009 12:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, giving you the benefit of the doubt....
The pressure on Flacco and the three sacks were then also part of the strategy to disguise the o-line play we’ll see in the next couple weeks. The receivers were content to mostly be blanketed by a cover zone. That will change too.
Belichick coughed up a game because he didn’t trust his defense. I wonder what Harbaugh and crew will be thinking as they prepare for the Colts.
by drj on Nov 17, 2009 11:01 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
At least we didn't "cough" it up
and perhaps those sacks were because of pretty basic pass routes that were easy to cover by even the Browns. Notice how nothing was run to the middle of the field ALL night?
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Nov 17, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
holding back?
Come on! We’re an average team…if we beat Indy and Pitt, then I’ll say we’re good!
by Ravenator on Nov 17, 2009 11:10 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I concur
We are an average team with little heart. Where is the fire the Ravens displayed last season? Did they honestly think coming into this season that they were “All That”??? My position that we will end the season no better than 9-7 still holds but jeez, we have to get a grip on things or look for the downward spiral that spelled doom for Brian Billick. Come on, we are better that this!!!!!!!
by Smiley4660 on Nov 17, 2009 11:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Trying to find a reason
`that doesn’t embarrass us.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Nov 17, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
“holding back?”
Are we that clever. I don’t think 4-4 teams (at that point) hold back. I think it’s overdrive to get in the end zone. For the sake of argument, not many teams won by 16 this past weekend. We can say we played the way we had to play to win. We just didn’t play to get better.
by raven on Nov 17, 2009 12:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, right now in the season. Would you rather see a defensive shut out or a offensive shootout? I think seeing our defense get a shut out is more important at the time, no matter what team we played. MNF on the road is no easy task. We have seen MULTIPLE times this season where we can put up 30+ points at anytime.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Nov 17, 2009 1:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
while i don’t think they weren’t trying, they definitely weren’t going to open up the playbook against a 1-win team. We scored 21 points in 4:33 against the Vikings defense, and we did it with explosive plays downfield as well as with Ray Rice in the running/screen game.
The main thing is that we run the ball early against Indy and don’t let Freeney and Mathis pin their ears back too soon. They can’t wait for the first passing down, and we should make them wait to see it.
We would also do well to keep Peyton Manning off the field. Call me crazy, but that’s why I agree with the 4th down call against them. Gruden agreed with it too. You give Peyton Manning two or more timeouts with more than 90 seconds to score and he’ll do it. We have to keep him off the field. This next one is going to be on the offense.
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
by jackmca on Nov 17, 2009 10:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yup!
I think Jack has summed it up exactly right. Any game vs. Peyton will always be an offensive shootout, like it or not. He will wear out most defenses, hands down, even the Ravens.
The first team that beats the Colts will do it as follows: 1) Defense will be good at sacking and intercepting, 2) Offense will be conservative and hold on to the ball as long as possible, and 3) Special Teams will MAKE CRAZY PLAYS!
by Psychropod on Nov 18, 2009 9:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
raven is blind to the past and only sees mistakes in the present.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Nov 18, 2009 11:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmmm....
Yeah. Looking back at what I said, I realized I just described the 2000 Ravens. :-D
by Psychropod on Nov 19, 2009 8:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone know if Heap is really banged up or just nursing a sore chest and set of ribs?
by Dynamo38 on Nov 17, 2009 11:13 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nursing
but LJ can be just as good a receiver and looked decent as a blocker last night.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Nov 17, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
run that by an eagles fan
and they’ll laugh you out of the building. While LJ’s physical abilities are fine, he’s prone to the dropsies and he’s no Todd Heap. He’s a good backup and kickoff coverage guy.
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
by jackmca on Nov 17, 2009 10:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Heap was hurt yet was in the game until the end..against Cleveland. Not a good move.
by raven on Nov 17, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think Gooden suffered a concussion but last night was not a bad win. These days, a win is a win in the nfl. Just a few weeks ago, the Bengals barely got by the browns. We knew the only way we could lose this game was if we made mistakes. If we played conservative, they had no chance at beating us. There was so reason to come out aggressive on offense against the browns to get the win. Although it was boring, it got us the W and we should be happy with that. I liked how we stuck with the run last night and even saw some Willis and more Mcclain action. If we can run the ball well next week against the colts and keep peyton off the field, we might be ok. Lets not forget everyone that we are only a missed kick and a dropped catch from being a two loss team. This season is not done but next week we gotta keep the ball rolling.
by ryantz on Nov 17, 2009 12:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
But you know
unless we make a change at kicker, more misses are in the future.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Nov 17, 2009 12:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Even the kick he made last night had some serious knuckleball action and broke the right way. At least that’s what I think I saw. There was no graceful arc in through the uprights that you’s expect to see.
by drj on Nov 17, 2009 12:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you did see it
you saw it break left like it always does. the same kick he always kicks. the only difference was that the one he made was from the right hash and the one he missed was from the left hash. but it was the same left-leaning wobbler he’s done all year. ’nuff said.
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
by jackmca on Nov 17, 2009 10:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
completely agree.
Sorry Stevie but you had your chance and the team even backed you after the vikings game. You have one job and that is to make kicks. You have run out of chances and I wish him luck in the future. I just don’t think that future is with Baltimore. If we want to make a run, we NEED change the kicker situation.
by ryantz on Nov 17, 2009 12:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I blame 2 of the big Houshka misses on the coaching. While a pro kicker should be able to hit from most anywhere, Steve is young and two times the coaches ran plays that put Steve on the left hash mark. Big deal? Yep. When your an excitable young kicker your going to power the ball and not really place it. With a right footed swing through the ball is going to carry left. After he missed in Minn., the coaches should have played to his tendencies UNTIL he got a little more confident and made some kicks. It takes time. The possible replacements aren’t any better. He’s a pro so he should have nailed the kicks he’s attempted but you can’t take adrenelin out of the equation.
by raven on Nov 17, 2009 12:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, off to Dental School for Steve "Wide-Right" Haushka.....
R.I.P. Tony Fein
May God watch over you wherever you are now and may you be in a better place. We will never forget you!
by Baltimore Warrior on Nov 17, 2009 9:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What’s really sad is that when Mr. Sluggs and his mega-salary went down, I was happy that Kruger would be coming in. Something wrong with that thinking especially with the money we are paying Mr. Sluggs. Is it me or do you think Sluggs kind of takes a back seat in the leadership department. I mean, Price gets after it more than he does….yeah yeah I know double teams blah blah blah..
by raven on Nov 17, 2009 12:46 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don't think his heart is completly in it
If he thinks it is fair that he got the biggest contract ever at the time, then he needs to show us that he can get 12+ sacks a year. James Harrison is double teamed and held every play, he has no problem getting sacks.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Nov 17, 2009 12:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
James Harrison made one of the best Superbowl plays ever, as well as winning DPOY, and his new contract still wasn’t as big as Suggs.‘. I’m with Raven. If you’re the highest-paid, you need to be the highest performer. period.
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
by jackmca on Nov 17, 2009 11:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Harrison is a bad MOFO. That dude is a missle. He put a hit on a Denver receiver (yes receiver) that almost equaled Clark’s hit on McGahee.
Webb is really coming on strong. I have to say he is the best new pick up. I’m going to start callin him:
Minimalu for the way he flies around.
by raven on Nov 17, 2009 1:28 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Do you compete with MaLoR to see who is the funniest?
Because I think you won this post. BTW I liked the caveman thing last night, I was cracking up every time you said something.
R.I.P. Tony Fein
May God watch over you wherever you are now and may you be in a better place. We will never forget you!
by Baltimore Warrior on Nov 17, 2009 9:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
he’s a very mini malu, that’s for sure. But he’s playing with confidence and instinct, which is hard not to like. Whenever he’s ready to take that starting CB job, baby I’m WITH IT.
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
by jackmca on Nov 17, 2009 11:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Goodbye Mr. Kicks
yeah yeah, I know I will sound like EVERY OTHER singer of the ‘I Told You So’ Song, but when I heard in the spring/early summer that the Ravens were not keeping Stover, I called my brother (a huge Ravens fan) and said “this is the dumbest thing the Ravens have done…next to signing Elvis Grbac”.
Stover was a team icon; next to Lewis and Heap, he was the most recognizable member of the team (Ed Reed my behind…please…he was at best fifth or sixth). Someone on another blog pointed out the Super Bowl winning season when Stover was the ‘Baltimore Offense’, which is such a true statement.
This new kid is way too nervouse; its the Boller mistake all over again. Will he be good. YES. Is his time to be #1 in a lineup as a kicker right now? No. Billick ignored the signs with Boller until it was way too late (and tried to replace him with McNair, another mistake), and now Boller is a psychological mess; he will never, ever be a starting QB of any merit. If Harbaugh wants to go down in history as ruining somebody just like Billick did, then he’ll keep Hauschka in. Let this kid breathe…and let it be somewhere else. Because I tell you, if he messes up in the Colts game, 80 year old grannies will be calling for his number (and if they keep him until the Steelers and he blows one kick, his name is mud in the AFC).
by Hyperkind on Nov 17, 2009 3:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Steve Mcnair
He gave us a good year his first time around but injuries and age caught up too him in his second year. I wouldn’t fault him too much for the bad offense, Billick is the guy you wanna go after. That Colts game in the playoffs still haunts me in my sleep.
"We don’t have any rearview mirrors in our car,"- John Harbaugh
by purpleonblack86 on Nov 17, 2009 7:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
it's like Elm Street how every time you bring it up, it becomes an unstoppable nightmare...
we held Peyton Manning to no touchdowns, 2 INTs, 15 points… and lost…
we held Peyton Manning to no touchdowns, 2 INTs, 15 points… and lost…
we held Peyton Manning to no touchdowns, 2 INTs, 15 points… and lost…
we held Peyton Manning to no touchdowns, 2 INTs, 15 points… and lost…
we held Peyton Manning to no touchdowns, 2 INTs, 15 points… and lost…
we held Peyton Manning to no touchdowns, 2 INTs, 15 points… and lost…
we held Peyton Manning to no touchdowns, 2 INTs, 15 points… and lost…
we held Peyton Manning to no touchdowns, 2 INTs, 15 points… and lost…
we held Peyton Manning to no touchdowns, 2 INTs, 15 points… and lost…
we held Peyton Manning to no touchdowns, 2 INTs, 15 points… and lost…
we held Peyton Manning to no touchdowns, 2 INTs, 15 points… and lost…
we held Peyton Manning to no touchdowns, 2 INTs, 15 points… and lost…
we held Peyton Manning to no touchdowns, 2 INTs, 15 points… and lost…
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
by jackmca on Nov 17, 2009 11:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Get it away!!! The evil Steve McNair!!!!!!!!!!
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Nov 18, 2009 11:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Stover WAS
the opertive word is “was.” He “is” no longer a distance kicker and with this offense we knew we needed one to make it from 50+ andStover just couldn’t. Trust me, if Vinitieri was not injured, Stover might only be playing here right now, and will be dropped by the Cols as soon as Adam is healthy.
aka 'Rexx'
by Bruce Raffel on Nov 18, 2009 1:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I called Hauschka Shankapotomus earlier in the week
He lived up to the name twice last night. Don’t worry guys, Harbaugh will come back to the media and spit some of his typical BS about how he KNOWS Steve is going to be a “great” kicker in this league for many years to come. He has said this every week after Hauschka has missed a critical kick.
He always comes back with a “Well, we know that Steve is going to miss some, it happens. So once he can get his groove going, we know he is going to be a great kicker in this league. He looks really strong in practice each week.”
Well coach, he looks terrible in games! I think Ray Finkle is better than Shankska.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Nov 17, 2009 3:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Scratch this comment. Lol
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on Nov 17, 2009 3:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Better Name
Me and my brother call him Sir Lefty Shanksalot
by Hyperkind on Nov 17, 2009 3:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Holding back???
Perhaps the Ravens told Sir Lefty Shanksalot to miss the FG against the Vikings so as to not let the colts know that were really are a good team. Lull them into a false sense of security. Brilliant.
We have them right where we want them !!! LOL
Veni, Vidi, Vici - Julius Caesar 47 BC
by PSU RAVEN on Nov 17, 2009 6:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, and we will let them rape us
30-2 in the first half to really get them going.
R.I.P. Tony Fein
May God watch over you wherever you are now and may you be in a better place. We will never forget you!
by Baltimore Warrior on Nov 17, 2009 9:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised. I mean, the Ravens could have a whole section of their playbook taped shut until this week, just for the Colts.
Ravens Rookie: “Hey, Ray Lewis, what’s this section of the playbook taped shut for?”
Ray Lews: makes crazy eyes “That’s for the Colts”
Ravens Rookie: “We have a section just for the Colts?”
Ray Lewis: stabs somebody “HELL YES WE DO.”
Ravens Rookie: “Uh, why?”
Ray Lewis: covers up stabbing “Because Peyton Manning CAN READ YO MIND.”
Ravens Rookie: “What? I mean yeah, he’s a good quarterback, but he’s not psychic.”
Ray Lewis: runs out of a tunnel, struts around like a turkey “No, he’s got ESPN or some shit. You even THINK about the play and he knows it. No one gets to know the plays we’re running against the Colts. Not even us.”
Ravens Rookie: “How are we supposed to play then?”
Ray Lewis: tackles someone, makes a big deal out of it like no one has ever tackled anyone before “You GUESS. If we all thinkin’ different plays, Peyton never gonna know which one we gonna run until we run it.”
Ravens Rookie: “But how will we know what play to run if we’re all guessing?”
Ray Lewis: gets unnecessarily fired up, commits personal foul “IT’S MIND GAMES, FOOL.” phone rings “Hold up, it’s Ochocinco, I gotta take this.”
Manning makes it Wayne on 'dem hoes! Wayne on 'dem hoes! Wayne on 'dem hoes!
http://monkeybiziu.deviantart.com
by MonkeyBusiness on Nov 18, 2009 12:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
And the question is: What’s the most desirable part of a deer in Pittsburgh?
Congrats MaLor you were right.
by raven on Nov 18, 2009 7:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 












