One Last Look
Hate to beat a dead horse, but I always try to find that proverbial needle-in-the- haystack of something positive to take out of what looks to be such a glaring negative on the surface. If you dig a little deeper, you can see the good, instead of just the bad and the ugly.
I'm talking about how our so-called #1 rated run defense gave up over 200 yards to the New York Giants in Sunday's 30-10 thrashing. It could have been even worse, had Brandon Jacobs not gotten himself injured and had Tom Coughlin not played it smart and kept him on the sidelines after he ran for 73 yards in the first quarter alone. Had he stayed in, he probably would have gone over 100 by halftime. In addition, had Coughlin been focusing on the record rather than just ending the game, he could have given the ball to Bradshaw a couple of more times instead of going into the victory set, and he certainly would have earned the last four yards he needed to go over the century mark as well. Giving up 100 yards to two rushers in the same game would have been more humiliation that I could have stood. Hats off to Coughlin for having the class not to rub it in, but something tells me we won't be talking about our so-called "streak" too much in the near future.
But where is the positive to take out of the #1 ranked run defense getting run over by the bus (Jacobs) and the sportscar (Bradshaw)? Here it is and you'll see that it makes sense. Jacobs finished with 73 yards on just 11 carries, for a 6.6 yards per carry average. His first carry was his longest, as it put them in scoring position on their first drive after his 36 yard run. Take away that carry, which was actually almost a tackle for loss, and he has 10 carries for 37 yards, a modest 3.7 yards per carry average. Bradshaw finished with 96 yards on 9 carries, with a 10.7 yard average per attempt. He had that one backbreaking long run of 77 yards down to our goal line that closed out the Giants scoring as we held them to a field goal. Take away that lone carry and he finishes with 8 carries for 19 yards, under 3 yards per attempt. Even their third back, Ward, had 22 of his 41 yards on 11 carries on one play. Without that big gainer, he also finishes with a meek 19 yards on 10 carries, good for under 2 yards/carry.
I'm trying to find the positive here, guys, and if the Ravens had made the inital tackles on those three plays and limited those guys to even around 10 yards each on those carries, then they would have still had over 100 yards as a team (probably around 120 yards), but none of them would have been anywhere near the century mark. What I'm trying to say here is that we just played the best team in the league. Now I know some of you will say the undefeated Titans should have that moniker, but we've played both and I'm sure there's no way you can say the Titans are a better, well rounded team on both sides of the ball than the Giants. Sunday, the Giants took a team that had won four in a row, regardless of who we beat, and made us look like the Detroit Lions, Oakland Raiders and Cincinnati Bengals, all rolled into one.
There are not going to be much in the way of an opponent the rest of the season who's offensive line and running backs come anywhere close to what the Giants showed us. The other three NFC East teams all boast good o-lines and running backs, but not to the extent of New York. Besides, none of them have a passing game that is as efficient as the Giants. I'm not saying they're better than the Cowboys through the air, but they are more efficient, as Eli doesn't make the mistakes that Romo does. The other three are definitely beatable and playing two of them at home is a huge advantage.
The Ravens can get back on track this weekend in hosting the Eagles, who should be embarassed to have had the first tie game since 2002, and that tie may come back to haunt them if they remain in the playoff hunt. However, since they are now 5-4-1 and coming here for a loss this weekend, leaving Baltimore with a 5-5-1 record will certainly not help their playoff chances.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I was thinking about this today
We were wrong to start Jim Leonard in this game. Our DBs simply struggled when the Giants running backs sprung into the secondary. We couldn’t get the press in the defensive line we are used to, and it hurt us big time. Leonard is a good player and a solid tackler, but it was unrealistic of us to rely on Leonard and Ed Reed in run support for this game. We really missed Dawan Landry, who can defend the run and pass from the SS position.
We should have played Tom Zbikowski, who struggles more in coverage, but is a hell of a hitter and could have done a much more consistent job nailing the running back if he broke through the front 7.
Not a bad point
However, I actually like Leonhard better than Landry. Landry got his meager rep playing next to one of the best safeties in the league. When Reed was hurt last year, Landry looked lost in the secondary. i do, however, think either Zbi or Haruki Nakamura can be better than either Leonhard or Landry, as both have excelled on Special Teams and love to hit. Zbi is an amateur boxer and Ruki is a black belt in judo, so they know how to hit.
Rexx
Landry struggled last year
which is to be expected by a 2nd year 5th round safety trying to marshall an imploding pass defense. Landry is a SS who is ok in coverage and strong in the run game. He’s definitely better than Leonard, although I hate to be bashing Leonard because he’s a good player and an excellent pickup for this team.
Landry is still a very good player.
Thats just an excuse!!
isn’t this the same defense that stoped every other team in that they played on the ground? It seems like everytime someone gets a long run on us once, they just keep piling it on….and on…and on… look i was as shocked as anyone else, but that Giants O-line is the best right now, and it was a tall oder for us to ask them the team to win 3 straight road games, and win a fourth against in my opinion the best team in the leauge. Dont forget we were suppose to be 1-9 right now. I think we will be okay. I really really doubt the eagles will run for 207 on us.
This summer
when I made my season predictions, I had us at 5-5 right now. So we’re doing better than even an optimist and homer even thought! Now, of course the expectations are a lot higher and .500 just won’t do it anymore. I want the AFC North title, dammit!
Rexx
Oh, no excuses
I’m just trying to come up with things that could have been done better after that loss.
Landry is still our guy
I mean, yea he looked a little confused at times without Reed back there, but he is one of our best open field tacklers we have. He did a lot for us during the 2006 season when we went 13-3. Landry compliments Reed very well. Reed is the ball hawk who sits back and controls the deeper parts of the field and Landry is almost like having another linebacker in there. The man can hit and is only going to get better. It is reall unfortunate what had to happen to him in the Cleveland game, because I felt this was going to be a break out season for him.
Lets hope he can come back 100% next year and show us why a 4th round pick should be our starting SS. Leonhard is good, but I dont think he is as good of a tackler as Landry is. I mean what has he shown us this year so far that he should start over Landry? Sure he has covered his part of the field fairly well, but I think Landry fits in a little better with our defense.
As for the two UFC Rookie safeties we have, dont think it is exactly their time to be starting for us. Zbi is great, I love his speed and toughness and Ruki is just tearing up people on special teams. I dont think there is one player on our special teams who has delivered bigger blows than Nakamura. Hey, we drafted them for a reason, who knows when they will get their shot at being in our secondary. We have already seen a good amount of packages with them in it. Zbi has blitzed a few times this year and Ruki has been in there a few times. I wouldnt mind giving either of them a shot at punt returns either. I do like Leonhard back there, as I feel he is the smartest punt returner we have, but Zbi and Ruki both played that role in college and excelled at it. Who knows, if they perform well, they will see more playing time, that is how our coaching staff works.
I normally wouldn't want Zbi starting over Leonard
but if the run game needs help in the secondary, Zbi is definitely our best option at the moment.
I appreciate the optimism But
nice bright side but thats like saying, “okay, Jacobs you got lucky with the big run…uh, Ward you got lucky with the big run..uh, Bradshaw you got lucky with the big run..” It was the same O line for all of them..That’s three monster runs buy their TEAM. I’m not being a smart ass and I get what your saying and want to be positive about this disaster but we could simply take away all Rice’s and McGAhee’s big runs out of each of their games and they too would be 3.0 running backs.
It’s always about catching a team off guard for the big run. Barry Sanders got caught in the backfield dancing more than any running back I remember (besides Jamal) BUT he would rip off a 90 yarder. It’s what he worked for/ set up. Jacobs would have had 200 alone. I’m not sure how hurt he is but wouldn’t that be something if they took him out as a precaution…That’s how confident they were in kicking our teeth in.
Your right that our second level run support was too small… and Landry is a harder hitter than Leonhard.
We played not to lose. Last night the Bills played not to lose on the last drive and fn; settled for a 45 yarder…stupid. These coaches are so dumb at times.
This just registered...
Ive mentioned it before. But we really lost this game on two plays by Derrick Mason. Even with our defense playing like SHIT without those 2 plays its a completely different game.
Play 1: Dropped pass in the end zone
Play 2: Dropped pass for an interception that in turn was returned for a touchdown.
Without those its 23-17, sounds like a completely different game to me. I’m not saying we would have won, im just saying its a different game
Life is nothing but Beats & Rhymes
Agreed
I totally see that interception for a pick six due to Mason’s shoulder hurting and being unable to lift it high enough to catch a ball he usually always brings in. Change that and the enitre game does as well. For me, that’s enough to have optimism going into the game against the Eagles.
Rexx

by 













